From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 13 18:50:49 2023 Received: (at 60640) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jan 2023 23:50:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52748 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pGTov-0000W7-4A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 18:50:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45732) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pGTos-0000Vl-NW for 60640@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 18:50:47 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pGTon-00059p-Ds; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 18:50:41 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=GrN4oWCK8qfnryTOlOY3PfgHh+TKs9+/g5VxhdT+CaM=; b=hkV/RcJD40T1XP0WAe3y o3XNL2m8IFWviHsOASvZD4OdW8dIzJzirQqgcIhFu0bEQO7UXDtW41LW9CfHNfd2UHXsgSxAmwrAl 9PBUi0Zq1Uzpgdb6l+Owxxpk6Rru0jAmmRpOg/+JGFaDkOjoXcpCZpEjv+j4DJ7sbX5/2HPFvJfuR 6Ye/35h2VuJHJ439HkS/7jscQvBNgCqJLIhZkI8SBVjl0/0FDbP0Ej/LvnCEavoOfivdX0om1tfB4 5sDM8gQMkqI2T9LJcXY7H7u0O+FzYkDJpzaw0auDFj+wdXD0IFoy+0JjnWCfkgi4DkM8RvCugDkOd BVU4feATaSx+Ng==; Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net ([91.160.117.201] helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pGTom-0001VV-Uh; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 18:50:41 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: =?utf-8?Q?Tor-bj=C3=B6rn?= Claesson Subject: Re: bug#60640: Gnu: Add gdcm References: <877cxyp1wf.fsf@gmail.com> <87y1qdo3qq.fsf@gmail.com> <87wn5rfldh.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <875ydau2vf.fsf@gmail.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Quintidi 25 =?utf-8?Q?Niv=C3=B4se?= an 231 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour du Chat X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2023 00:50:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: <875ydau2vf.fsf@gmail.com> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Tor-bj=C3=B6rn?= Claesson"'s message of "Fri, 13 Jan 2023 12:45:10 +0200") Message-ID: <87wn5q9epc.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60640 Cc: 60640@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, Tor-bj=C3=B6rn Claesson skribis: > The pushed patch is version 2.8, whereas my patch is version 3.0. I was > able to port my application to 2.8 in 3 minutes, so I don't notice big > functional differences=3D) > > Also it does tests, which I did not get to work yet, but it does not > specify system libraries. Could you send (in this issue) one patch that updates to 3.0, and another one to use system libraries? That=E2=80=99d be perfect! Thanks in advance, Ludo=E2=80=99.