From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 21 14:54:17 2023 Received: (at 60266) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Mar 2023 18:54:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60622 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1peh7g-0005W7-Nz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 14:54:17 -0400 Received: from mout-p-101.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.151]:41388) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1peh7e-0005Vp-FV for 60266@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 14:54:15 -0400 Received: from smtp202.mailbox.org (smtp202.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::202]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-101.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Ph13f2PG9z9sV3; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 19:54:06 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1679424846; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7EkJgkY6KT1uGvvqHvmqv/sCL+N6g+Y17MhUQlmx8q8=; b=xjWTf93hlJPd2IZ7jUQKZl2rXH6BQ0XMdU73t00B6qs4hV03oJWSIpTIBP8cEww+IxhXdN 4l2oFne371q0uKzCSycY8am+IHB0bWR7RXzrlooPZfC8QIZvExWejqFTVA79pnZyKUdVPX xI2NWewXRgm46SPxLkxC7P08yct5mYK2IkuoCsOqAcWvw9yeRKsNVJMhTGjOeJAuNV/X8K GYQr0/wX+6tGbPk7N60CkgQNpGgRkHNOoskpBeglHVM0VmWpJsQ2eDpJ27UwyFhxBTqESZ aidKhXO+w8yIaL76vKHVmXMDllvTYXwFH6DOsTLTDfYK1LlFWOq64J7fO0juHA== From: Antero Mejr To: Liliana Marie Prikler Subject: Re: [bug#60266] [PATCH] gnu: Add form. In-Reply-To: <73af16a03efa3f4dad83bde3571731ce7a277360.camel@gmail.com> (Liliana Marie Prikler's message of "Thu, 16 Mar 2023 06:23:09 +0100") References: <20221223011551.32708-1-antero@mailbox.org> <92910915624cad61de6c1fc75cbe6ac2b8c6fe27.camel@posteo.net> <871qlpzebc.fsf@mailbox.org> <73af16a03efa3f4dad83bde3571731ce7a277360.camel@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 18:53:58 +0000 Message-ID: <87cz523ph5.fsf@mailbox.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MBO-RS-META: 77w4br1jkgkxrn4t3p1hxa7yxsswh1nu X-MBO-RS-ID: 727a88c7f32c3bdd838 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60266 Cc: 60266@debbugs.gnu.org, Eric Bavier X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > Test failures should also be fixed at build time. Other than that, you > could also try to fix the memory leak that causes the failure via a > patch. Fixed the test failure at build time in v3. >> > Guix usually assumes `SSE2` capabilities for x86_64 targets, iirc. > It does, but not for i386 to i686, which also often see sse2 flags in > build systems. I did some benchmarks on a few workloads with millions of terms. The "tunable" optimizations didn't consistently improve the performance. Sometimes it would be a couple percent faster, sometimes slower. So I didn't mark the package as tunable. >> I used the other homepage so people can skip the weird "license >> agreement" page at https://www.nikhef.nl/~form/. > Calling the GPL a license agreement is weird, and it doesn't help that > https://www.nikhef.nl/~form/maindir/ also refers to it. Perhaps we can > raise an issue about that upstream? I would prefer not to bother upstream further regarding the website, since I already had to ask them to change an invalid license statement in a file header (which they did).