Hey, > Implemented in v2! I guess it could be useful. Note that it doesn't > parse the patch for the file names touched, instead it assumes the patch > was produced from a commit registered in git and then use the usual code > path (for simplicity). Nice! I think that it is fair to assume that the commit is registered in the local git repository. As a follow-up a documentation update could also be interesting as I think that the new 'cc-members patch' command is easier to use that the 'cc-member start end' variant. I had a look to the rest of the patchset it seems fine to me :) Thanks, Mathieu