From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 06:22:22 2022 Received: (at 60013) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2022 11:22:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51272 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p7xAz-0005kk-Pa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 06:22:22 -0500 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:53048) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p7xAw-0005kb-8C for 60013@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 06:22:20 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8125040796; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 12:22:15 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WuXv5ksDFwKP; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 12:22:14 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=4ba0ce779d152c5afc7ffb5aa193cf1dd5732d99d507a9a0f747f909bbcd; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1671621733; bh=yOR7wt28a/rl1tEjiV1dRMqToOEUiP7LpOLts/1k158=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=N6CalgU2WZH2zncBRc/AeF7kf0pFxQtFItZclc5uhKcF5u1zV25z6s35D/6NSW9MS 7bIF+ZKb4j/YMwtGOuPSMSVUaf3BJFnaN0pLiLHeerWdYeHUa42xR2SSBUuXZHtRAU GBAxa6U4XlPuPbVRgXMY2I3ei/vD03SY+lng6xLIyFUkDnREMq3QCK5MFXIGh2sfnT aOGU3MfaCFm2YFs2iK6Ofztym1j/oMFIhlNJqXoMGlRPfje8JSrBiM0lQEclnkvpQh BGxyNcVQ2/Q5g6xOoD1UFdZR3p1JFj3LiY8D/pMkwMswayP2POQ5pALuXahNFmKwUL svUVjH80TEh2A== Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 11:22:09 +0000 Message-Id: From: "(" To: "Florian" , "zimoun" , <60013@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Re: [bug#60013] [PATCH 1/3] gnu: Add libmodule References: <87edt47ecz.fsf@posteo.net> <91575b0f95b5a71b18108b57fa1a366e0f6044c9.1670876889.git.florhizome@posteo.net> <86tu20b2uu.fsf@gmail.com> <87tu1zr072.fsf@posteo.net> <86pmckdhts.fsf@gmail.com> <871qounifm.fsf@posteo.net> In-Reply-To: <871qounifm.fsf@posteo.net> X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60013 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) --4ba0ce779d152c5afc7ffb5aa193cf1dd5732d99d507a9a0f747f909bbcd Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue Dec 20, 2022 at 4:33 PM GMT, Florian wrote: > On 2022-12-15, 12:31 +0100, zimoun wrote: > Creating a branch, yes, but continuously rebasing them all and recompilin= g before > working on each single commission: yes (building guix is pretty time > intensive). Maybe try using ``guix worktree'' to create new directories for each branch= checkout. > This is where I think guix lacks a proper CI/CD. That contributors > even have to check if a patch applies, if it builds and run guix lint > seems paradox to me, especially with the capacity problems that already e= xist > when accepting submissions. Have you seen ? :) -- ( --4ba0ce779d152c5afc7ffb5aa193cf1dd5732d99d507a9a0f747f909bbcd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGzBAABCgAdFiEE6Vh10NblKE5doNlW7ImHg/nqI20FAmOi7GEACgkQ7ImHg/nq I23RdAv8D1c3o/9eUQziTVJCJbDeoK6mzeUIZdYth4RnbvPviKXsJG94/Y7nhSOh DkeNYtvtgu5hkNNcH/VCtyODJWnr4t9LJakx9iCnHo4MOQ2kzQILHL73maiiwxKz W0w3EQgs+nvZs0fpRAjSZbBgpebihui7X00tTaiD8UBEviep/1H7yZKYIQuqhzKO Y4ShYqe7Wy+SrLyIkDuAT2OZ32PuUnUUgiYkDK/IZOe9uEQLTbPtn5gjUigEcJv/ /mbgODz9HC6qmLCKJOc4HsPNe4HfNHye8CqmkNFeXpR/4VyZiLLAOQmQGeUGpQvU N37YjaFyb1YrJMmpCeWQbUrsf8FQfnkrfXrFJdCoIn2UujcVfCfwbdm+hkvKGM3p sc5hYF7MyFecsYbEwtnGGKS8bvISjYPvn0n4sITK5Uhi/p2OHKVuzke2Xjr5ekh5 pGCu3Tgh+C59wjuL4+g4gtbXqvMtiDNK2C1j1s1IFKM6Y6Jhynuyu92imH13s5L7 apTZ6Sen =jpDO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4ba0ce779d152c5afc7ffb5aa193cf1dd5732d99d507a9a0f747f909bbcd--