From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 06 17:53:52 2023 Received: (at 59822) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2023 22:53:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56021 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pDvax-0006QT-T5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 17:53:52 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50526) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pDvav-0006QG-OC for 59822@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 17:53:50 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pDvap-0008FJ-BE; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 17:53:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=nb4KPKp+ax15LIiAxCtmlp2fwbAwRpNCIpAc5+SSz6Q=; b=ZV6XV4mqAXY4MdcLWSbq pyC8rJO6Vi3kCW+o/YPEJqV8QABK6M0XRoiQw2QFQ7ACF9HEpNofbWgEbVBZmCj0HMtNzFhW3iKMC 2LipZs0TZ0WEma1LQrdzhLKnCjTxeEahHOUgCr/H1kqWDrCaZ5g2h+9O4ZxWggs6B4bO6bDZVqneo J6vLmLYhXluF7zzKOQD9A6WyrTohsQau3UbP+rzMdE/qVrHIGVOgbft0SCWtYiDZM1qHKyxZYOUqG 4rN+fk7NmxHg2eGQWz8na1xTTxo28btHO6msC7S0cZbz+bnptGdcRkPzcLBS2LF1zvkTLgw3f5Mh8 PTi+wIGcJzUkGw==; Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net ([91.160.117.201] helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pDvao-0000Pr-RS; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 17:53:43 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: zimoun Subject: Re: [bug#59822] [PATCH guix-artwork] website: base: home: Add 'DOWNLOAD LATEST' button. References: <20221204195007.20997-1-paren@disroot.org> <87edterg7x.fsf@pelzflorian.de> <87a642rfui.fsf@pelzflorian.de> <875yeqrfmz.fsf@pelzflorian.de> <878rjm9t5l.fsf@pelzflorian.de> <87y1rhzvxz.fsf@pelzflorian.de> <86y1rhg412.fsf@gmail.com> <87r0ws50yl.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87pmc1kroh.fsf@gmail.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Septidi 17 =?utf-8?Q?Niv=C3=B4se?= an 231 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour de la Marne X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2023 23:53:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87pmc1kroh.fsf@gmail.com> (zimoun's message of "Fri, 30 Dec 2022 13:21:50 +0100") Message-ID: <87cz7rxojv.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 59822 Cc: "\(" , "pelzflorian \(Florian Pelz\)" , 59822@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hello! zimoun skribis: > On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 at 14:40, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> zimoun skribis: >> >>> The front page contains the explicit version >>> number with the button =C2=ABDownload v1.3.0=C2=BB. Why not, just remo= ve this >>> version label and just have the button =C2=ABDownload=C2=BB? >> >> Because people would be downloading the snapshot of the day, for which >> we haven=E2=80=99t done as much testing as during a regular release proc= ess. > > I do not see why just the button =C2=ABDownload=C2=BB instead of the butt= on > =C2=ABDownload v1.4.0=C2=BB would lead to people downloading something el= se than > the link, i.e., the webpage named . Oh sorry, I had totally misunderstood. :-) No strong opinion about whether or not to keep =E2=80=9Cv1.4.0=E2=80=9D on = the button. It nobody objects, we can apply those patches. "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" skribis: > Making latest more discoverable would be unlikely to make it used > exactly by the select few in need of its features. > > Probably we better remove latest from the top menu? > > I wouldn=E2=80=99t want newcomers to go for latest because hey, it=E2=80= =99s displayed > prominently and newer. The installation routine for the latest > installer image also may break. Or after installation, some software is > broken. Which would mean the initial install is broken, and no > roll-back is available. Yes, I agree. But then, where would you put the link to /latest? Or maybe we can keep it in the menu but add a prominent warning on the page stating that these are snapshots that haven=E2=80=99t seen as much QA? Ludo=E2=80=99.