From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 02 17:04:01 2022 Received: (at 59726) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2022 22:04:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49135 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p1E8X-0001rh-6P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2022 17:04:01 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53630) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p1E8V-0001rb-03 for 59726@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2022 17:04:00 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p1E8N-0006Uu-KT; Fri, 02 Dec 2022 17:03:51 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=DaJE1kPJ9yEUgb8J07BaM4qperPSgKON1fVMJOHPyvU=; b=ROpOGxAcZQGmjHNJIaCw 5WT8L7Uf7dpRs1D8+uROIogtLbjJgsoV/G//iV+TJbK816dj0ka+mkNWW/oEPmDd85uuQ7jJDGgPt yoS/mWqupORkK81mMtJtIiEKJKbUUoMBl0M30+TXTGTF58Tb6KrBzM7XtlD6N27Q7RyZd3gKHcviQ OMwadtFREt7hl7sDvMowbtjtV7IfeV249XfO9/O18psDS7zKFtF43a+gcqx1s/SHfW2Y9tLDZSVb8 oIi4tJ23XT/N9a1jGkWrOuS7V82KoJw+d5H5aL5ycs47JdaBDg6suNgKmrjL3Qy+yVkiENQMTf6QO VlpsTUt0CZAFhw==; Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net ([91.160.117.201] helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p1E8N-0002mE-31; Fri, 02 Dec 2022 17:03:51 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Z572 <873216071@qq.com> Subject: Re: bug#59726: [PATCH 0/2] gnu: g-wrap: Build with Guile 3.0. References: Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2022 23:03:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: (873216071@qq.com's message of "Thu, 1 Dec 2022 00:29:37 +0800") Message-ID: <87o7slpinv.fsf_-_@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 59726 Cc: 59726@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, Z572 <873216071@qq.com> skribis: > * gnu/packages/guile-xyz.scm(g-wrap)[source]: Modify configure to add Gui= le > 3.0 support. move Modify configure guilemoduledir to it. dons't use remov= ed > api. > > [inputs]: add Guile 3.0, indent. > [native-inputs]: add Guile 3.0. > [propagated-inputs]: add libffi, remove guile-2.2. > [arguments]: > <#:configure-flags>: remove it. > <#:parallel-build?>: set it to #f. > <#:make-flags>: set it to '("GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=3D0)". > <#:phases>: add set-indent-program-path phase, remove pre-configure phase. G-Wrap has only one user, Guile-GNOME, which is stuck on Guile 2.2. Thus I think G-Wrap has to remain on 2.2. Besides, G-Wrap has been unmaintained for some time and there are other, more convenient ways to write bindings these days. I think we can leave it as is. Thoughts? Ludo=E2=80=99.