Hi Chris, On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 at 17:01, Christopher Baines wrote: > * gnu/packages/guile-xyz.scm (guile-fibers-latest): New variable. From my understanding, the convention seems ’-next’ and not ’-latest’. --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- 45 candidates: ./gnu/packages/freedesktop.scm:1210:(define-public wayland-protocols-next ./gnu/packages/bioconductor.scm:13526:(define-public r-cistopic-next [...] ./gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm:25239:(define-public emacs-spaceline-next --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Although, 6 packages are using ’-latest’. :-) --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- 6 candidates: ./gnu/packages/guile-xyz.scm:1359:(define-public guile-email-latest ./gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm:4161:(define-public java-htsjdk-latest ./gnu/packages/tls.scm:333:(define-public gnutls-latest ./gnu/packages/guile.scm:391:(define-public guile-3.0-latest ./gnu/packages/perl.scm:5493:(define-public perl-inc-latest ./gnu/packages/ruby.scm:5378:(define-public ruby-latest-ruby --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Well, since this appears in the name, it appears to me better to have the same convention; for discover-ability, for instance. Cheers, simon