From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 18 23:07:48 2022 Received: (at 59372) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Nov 2022 04:07:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38645 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1owF8u-0001Jm-CL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 23:07:48 -0500 Received: from mx2.dismail.de ([159.69.191.136]:40882) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1owF8s-0001JR-15 for 59372@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 23:07:47 -0500 Received: from mx2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 2061d018; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 05:07:39 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=date :message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= 20190914; bh=oWTom6qOVvfkio0oU0h0jh8KFwrmFGhEio5afvooACI=; b=jP+ 4whVBtRDW4fe5CgJFLsxmyqG1eujKRKheGZVKjcvZU3KRpZnFq+1XxBfEoi9iQ0x GZExOtq36DLoSNvf+aZjPCBi+IIu2umkRKK4VinxN0g+WtKljaZ+2ADKgZFpQ7xy nfoyeWCwW3lq/dSOmO5WgB/oPUklH6isk2eb91xarGVGVc7YeQtz6xe9sHRpUm69 vXWGvGjt/84HuGIw4ZjNUG82F0toqpk1VWU3rJwClB5cgTOeDQdvRWMZMB9FmDG0 SilW59/0wylN3+wxvgbny5qSVvbvPbCPrxzzvZNHXwMCCM9Ch2mS6QLiJP1q2Zst py+YXrnkClJDsc8PoGA== Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 1c2a9437; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 05:07:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id ffd212e6; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 05:07:38 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id a7fb8d22 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 19 Nov 2022 05:07:37 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 22:07:30 -0600 Message-ID: <20221118220730.GB6211@dismail.de> From: jgart To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: [bug#59372] [PATCH] gnu: peek: Add missing input. In-Reply-To: <87sfifabuy.fsf@nckx> References: <20221119012744.30470-1-jgart@dismail.de> <87sfifabuy.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 59372 Cc: 59372@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-patches@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) On Sat, 19 Nov 2022 03:50:05 +0100 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > As far as I can tell, this change doesn't affect the peek > package's output at all. Am I mistaken? What should the > observable difference be, beyond ‘working’? It was complaining on Ubuntu when I started it that either ffmpeg needs to be installed or a gnome-shell needs to be running. I didn't log the exact error message but that was more or less it. > How are you invoking both peeks, and testing the difference? When I add ffmpeg it worked without the warning and actually started recording my screen as expected. After pressing the record button of course ;() I tested once without ffmpeg and once with ffmpeg. The former failed to record. > Are they both running in the exact same environment, back-to-back? Yup I tested both in Ubuntu. Let me know if you'd like any more info or if I wasn't precise enough in my description. all best, jgart