From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 08 16:05:38 2023 Received: (at 59188) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2023 21:05:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56747 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pPrdJ-000415-Lx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2023 16:05:38 -0500 Received: from mail1.fsfe.org ([217.69.89.151]:40950) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pPrdH-00040b-G7 for 59188@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2023 16:05:36 -0500 From: jlicht@fsfe.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fsfe.org; s=2021100501; t=1675890333; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Rk5mdthxN2Ia8Sotx3VmaenMoIWTeNeiGsi8dP12hXU=; b=FUyCfNOZTQoptbAlb9qcFCpVBqhRNeljyuTfu0lKqdFKjVLCyRf3O4gK3j8L65sajDJdq/ ibnyoQoQnWhOi1ngFFSOXS+IS9BPEfFL46goWTAj4D+4xFFQy+1lM5fHk/inMl2YQNIWcp RdfYQAqcjSh/6um5A3K/wKTijH2d2+A= To: 59188@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: [PATCH v3 00/16] Updating node-lts to 18.X Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 22:05:15 +0100 Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 59188 Cc: Jelle Licht X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) From: Jelle Licht Folks, This should at least build for x86_64, and I'm sending in a 'new' patch series in the hopes of QA picking things up this time. Hilton, I've taken the liberty of adding in a copyright line for your node-lts update: I've also tweaked some versions so there would be less manual patching and backports to do, namely: * libuv-for-node to 1.44.2 * node-lts to 18.14.0 I needed to tweak some of our existing packages so they actually explicitly state which dependencies they do not care about; with the npm bundled with node < 16, things "Just Worked", but since then npm has become a bit stricter. After applying my patches they should build with either node@14 (current packaged version) or node@18 (Hilton's version). Hilton Chain (4): gnu: libuv-for-node: Update to 1.44.2. gnu: llhttp-bootstrap: Update to 6.0.10. gnu: node-lts: Update to 18.14.0. gnu: libnode: Use node-lts as base. Jelle Licht (12): gnu: node-acorn: Disable tests. gnu: node-acorn: Remove lifecycle script. gnu: node-acorn: Fix broken transpilation. gnu: node-buffer-crc32: Ignore development dependencies. gnu: node-crx3: Ignore development dependencies. gnu: node-minimist: Ignore development dependencies. gnu: node-pbf: Ignore development dependencies. gnu: node-protocol-buffers-schema: Ignore development dependencies. gnu: node-resolve-protobuf-schema: Ignore development dependencies. gnu: node-ieee754: Ignore development dependencies. gnu: node-yazl: Ignore development dependencies. gnu: node-uglify-js: Update to 3.14.2. gnu/local.mk | 1 - gnu/packages/cran.scm | 2 +- gnu/packages/libevent.scm | 4 +- gnu/packages/node-xyz.scm | 110 +++++++++++++----- gnu/packages/node.scm | 49 +++++--- .../llhttp-bootstrap-CVE-2020-8287.patch | 100 ---------------- gnu/packages/uglifyjs.scm | 4 +- 7 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 149 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/llhttp-bootstrap-CVE-2020-8287.patch base-commit: 07e74b63d4969de0b51c48edb586f0d7d8c08db7 -- 2.39.1