To clarify, when I mentioned Guix QA shows failure, Guiox QA was showing "failure" trying to queue the issue to build, not that Gux QA was showing some build log with the patch failing to build in some way. So I don't know if you are saying people should look at Guix QA sources and help to fix that. That is possible, of course, but people contributing to Guix patches may have no background at all at how Guix QA works. On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 9:15 AM Andy Tai wrote: > > you meant fixing the issue in Guix QA? > > It goes without saying that Guix QA is far from the code in question > of this issue and my question on Guix QA also went unanswered on the > mailing list. > > > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 3:36 AM Simon Tournier wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 at 07:35, Andy Tai wrote: > > > > > Guix QA seemed confused about the old bug, always in a failed state > > > > It appears to me better to point the issues and then maybe fix them > > instead of bypassing them. My 2 cents. > > > > Cheers, > > simon -- Andy Tai, atai@atai.org, Skype: licheng.tai, Line: andy_tai, WeChat: andytai1010 Year 2023 民國112年 自動的精神力是信仰與覺悟 自動的行為力是勞動與技能