From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 26 08:21:45 2022 Received: (at 58694) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2022 13:21:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38174 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oyv7o-0001GW-SF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 08:21:45 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f44.google.com ([209.85.221.44]:35521) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oyv7k-0001Fm-3H for 58694@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 08:21:41 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f44.google.com with SMTP id b12so10374551wrn.2 for <58694@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 05:21:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DV969CxlOQOq/4d9OqJp14Ka4sdVmIH6QkzHUCIJ38w=; b=EKKOS5JKJEfCvWohyqLapx1jhS1uBRAlT6hWjKbv2teGYjd9/bzDroOgKf2GX2MnwM Ab7HKjN2vVUXfjegR/iGcqgI1v2wfkQ6Zc/SbcxIRPkWz3Udx/26QhJ/28lTdoTn0qVI ktcu7IiAlGu8vCkU9LKwLho6CfwM3YN5WgQ/4FZnsow7whQqKhs6TxSMpK/Fk0Ex9fA4 4cFZ97ZjOfrIQY3JyK2DK+Y8y1+AAKl+xIQyxh1hKz1X91j/haIn5ymcFSrlarSUixJF JsKfAxXPu9e0hW8PNUx5NyWgVCPdxezhndIEv6g12oYShkyYxi7UBz5IE83ui+U59atM fqqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DV969CxlOQOq/4d9OqJp14Ka4sdVmIH6QkzHUCIJ38w=; b=DJ9Xt8NBjZFKpv7hNkqwMP5rFF4CdYFbK4j0xihxAyTh7NwA5PdX4aN7kN966FE0CB OiPpAa7KgYTxkkmijdZHye15Ad5epbbevc1fPU8HtihaviTNULCIzMT4QEiuUeHwPmvE HAVVE1GC5NmXfHdTOyTi0Bb8qJcV3czTQSmxAl+sZTBtdj1JEyPbR9GAfrq57I1JBY8t DAgnZmYJ+qeJcguzpEJrqZd+ggeiCjb19yeKT2F5R1G9Jf+mIGKpNojiSwscPI2vIIKy 5o/egM114GAEAvDrlgCIQDeUCoV+W8OqjIQW0ZkspfamBs+If3cQXE651+gSufrD3XTG Wvfg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnQFWBGbKJwNixskkzs94hlQ3ku8aqOkeY18pN6JLT7cJ69SKwM 8es6veenyDY6klY7CFRMQ9kR5UBtXO4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5+bquQ5RXgwbPkk6m4Jdm937l8YcOtPoh5f2VxJa7kdpnUDxUy0pZp40psgSFMENQLUFzLFQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1e0f:b0:238:3d2a:cd12 with SMTP id bj15-20020a0560001e0f00b002383d2acd12mr26513371wrb.172.1669468894231; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 05:21:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l19-20020a056000023300b00241de5be3f0sm6054899wrz.37.2022.11.26.05.21.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 26 Nov 2022 05:21:33 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun To: Rostislav Svoboda , 58694@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#58694: `sudo --login guix pull` fails In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 11:04:26 +0100 Message-ID: <86zgceav6d.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 23:53, Rostislav Svoboda wrote: > substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0% > substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'.. [...] Content analysis details: (1.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.221.44 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.1 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (zimon.toutoune[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.221.44 listed in wl.mailspike.net] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 58694 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) Hi, On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 23:53, Rostislav Svoboda wrote: > substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0% > substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0% > substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0% > \sha256 hash mismatch for > /gnu/store/n2d3rwbvrlag5c1spv1b73vvg9w2r8cw-autoconf-2.69.tar.xz: > expected hash: 113nlmidxy9kjr45kg9x3ngar4951mvag1js2a3j8nxcz34wxsv4 > actual hash: 1sb0709wirgkag5zcv8c72l4xc5g4qhr6syxf8w8i4vhnjsdg2hp > hash mismatch for store item > '/gnu/store/n2d3rwbvrlag5c1spv1b73vvg9w2r8cw-autoconf-2.69.tar.xz' > build of /gnu/store/xijrkm01sqviaqkgfd1r7gjipzpfxkbz-autoconf-2.69.tar.xz.drv > failed Well, I do not know what happened. It works for me and I get: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix build /gnu/store/xijrkm01sqviaqkgfd1r7gjipzpfxkbz-autoconf-2.69.tar.xz.drv 1.2 MB will be downloaded: /gnu/store/n2d3rwbvrlag5c1spv1b73vvg9w2r8cw-autoconf-2.69.tar.xz substituting /gnu/store/n2d3rwbvrlag5c1spv1b73vvg9w2r8cw-autoconf-2.69.tar.xz... downloading from https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/n2d3rwbvrlag5c1spv1b73vvg9w2r8cw-autoconf-2.69.tar.xz ... autoconf-2.69.tar.xz 1.2MiB 533KiB/s 00:02 [##################] 100.0% /gnu/store/n2d3rwbvrlag5c1spv1b73vvg9w2r8cw-autoconf-2.69.tar.xz $ guix hash /gnu/store/n2d3rwbvrlag5c1spv1b73vvg9w2r8cw-autoconf-2.69.tar.xz 113nlmidxy9kjr45kg9x3ngar4951mvag1js2a3j8nxcz34wxsv4 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > View build log at > '/var/log/guix/drvs/xi/jrkm01sqviaqkgfd1r7gjipzpfxkbz-autoconf-2.69.tar.xz.drv.bz2'. > building /gnu/store/971s9hm3armq58qxfiigs1pkmc35ynj3-CUnit-2.1-3.tar.bz2.drv... > Backtrace: > 13 (primitive-load > "/gnu/store/45qgzlh67nvkwl7ms1g5h7nxq5yavw2i-compute-guix-derivation") [...] > guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program > '/gnu/store/45qgzlh67nvkwl7ms1g5h7nxq5yavw2i-compute-guix-derivation' > failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: > "78d4a08ac3a1de481bc56eef967a2e5ed2a912d5"; system: "x86_64-linux"; > host version: "1.3.0"; pull-version: 1). > Please report the COMPLETE output above by email to . Well, I miss why a hash mismatch returns a backtrace and is not nicely handled. Hum, something similar had been reported in #59179 [1]. 1: Cheers, simon