From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 28 13:02:18 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Oct 2022 17:02:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34188 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ooSkM-0006vY-KN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 13:02:18 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:43316) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ooSkH-0006vM-0U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 13:02:15 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ooSkE-0008Pd-MI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 13:02:11 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ooSkC-0007js-H6 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 13:02:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=k0E+2kYuH8Qrr H6bUwnfSboQPV0cfJefJyWPQ3khODw=; h=in-reply-to:date:subject:cc:from: references; d=tobias.gr; b=EAS67QKFpMhx4PklfPRQKmc3JiVkAZQIOHBMlHaqWtO tH+6K0+Xp7P8aXcEI6f59Bh/SCuf1p5UyYHuU4tx1t7dvAWvlA+3AiaMRCS2H7Qd1Opg8n 8J+QmcVhC/6WO3exzwBvTDFjgGeb1ymwatjGqHlu1s26KtVuXMcGLLu8TrZ7Qdjq4GJdk+ HE7oQ0bMVVKeo0or/4HNqrwQALfnPL6jeJTcKu2CaJfk/Vz8y3UxJIPnDqWqVDhw54NkC6 Hky0IsQEdRZ1MrPCNXsDCIOnSFRtuB76oeqVeBMi1GS8Vuk3oxT+zysEBYYDtvPxqUum0P KzwtALnIFvsFvb1O3iQ== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 97f0c300 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 28 Oct 2022 17:01:57 +0000 (UTC) References: <20221017121642.15468-1-paren@disroot.org> <20221017165057.15648-1-paren@disroot.org> <874jw2l3m6.fsf@gmail.com> <87ilk5hw3g.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <86a65g8k9a.fsf@gmail.com> <87r0yrzzht.fsf@nckx> From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: [bug#58583] [PATCH 0/1] scripts: package: Forbid installation of the guix package. Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 19:01:30 +0200 In-reply-to: <87r0yrzzht.fsf@nckx> BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; Message-ID: <87mt9fzxri.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-Spam_score_int: -10 X-Spam_score: -1.1 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: paren@disroot.org, 58583@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-patches@gnu.org, maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com, zimoun X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-patches via =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A >> For instance, if an user packs their Guile application using=20 >> some >> other >> Guile libraries including the Guix library, then for=20 >> developing, it >> becomes not possible to just locally create a profile. > > Why not? Would this be address by refusing only to =E2=80=98guix install guix=E2=80= =99=20 without an explicit --profile argument? This would eliminate 99%=20 of unintentional footguns. We could still warn. Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCY1wLUQ0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15KYkA/iFEORnCT2kxYf6z4ChHeQ/dFdCNMzWKguhfJOWY AWlCAQCICqzphp0HTivVfh6p2ZnjxxyUoyzOwHTOn1dWp+WXDA== =uvVU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--