Hi Liliana, On Sat, 15 Oct 2022 at 16:40, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > Done. Since I just copypasta'd the wording, I made you the author. Oh, thanks. (It was the news’ wording. :-)) > As for this bug: I've bumped emacs-next to a version that can inhibit > almost all native-compilation (trampolines are still compiled, but not > written to the cache), fixed the linker issue, and disabled native > compilation for emacs-ido-completing-read+. Any remaining native-comp > issues or can this be closed? Closing is fine with me; well I do not have a opinion on that. :-) Just to be sure, do you mean an emacs-next version which includes the upstream Lars’s patches? The ones that Eli and Andrea are calling to be reverted? --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Sorry as changeset I meant 5fec9182db + f97993ee66. I'm not against e245c4f226. [...] Again 5fec9182db + f97993ee66 are IMO not useful / wrong, they were not discussed and are just a step backward. The best change I can suggest is to revert them now. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- from Cheers, simon