From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 06 14:30:05 2022 Received: (at 57721) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2022 18:30:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33550 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ogVdF-0001Rq-1I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2022 14:30:05 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:35474) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ogVdD-0001RP-Cw for 57721@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2022 14:30:04 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B646C4C9C8; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 20:29:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with UTF8SMTP id pNukRxj1XNtK; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 20:29:49 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1665080499; bh=UzJiYa7CQNzboG6TLFQ5P1RYAG7f+0/pSRaKQIcqYSA=; h=Date:Cc:Subject:From:To:References:In-Reply-To; b=fppwdG3WD6AwXWLM3y6sj7DAZ3W8mv8FJVTpfwNh3rqo6gIXE3BoW12+on+eiQFkj WsdMKH7W/SQxUm6cVbw7MjFgn07IGdcnBXysr5jl4/iajbmh0IpOlLnuaLAesICHyw ZgQwL+TpxXfH9pC1LQX0w9p4cJaKCNdFp3PrNqokT0wgeEpZPLj+AduZcZn9vDSRae kB53pw2ftjeB2f9ssPk2ySGBulge3jAh8OFbvepM6JPzBmABgQR53ltX3OtY5a3MBe 6QYZNaRQx47mW4k2JfmvpNqs+RVS/3aMFkDEZXHdFP8AV+SKwUCedeWI1eFfviX+z0 zp4RORw2I6cnQ== Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2022 19:21:38 +0100 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [bug#57721] [PATCH 0/4] gnu: base: Add greetd-wlgreet-sway-session. From: "(" To: "Christopher Baines" References: <20220910202903.17482-1-paren@disroot.org> <87y1tt2g1c.fsf@cbaines.net> In-Reply-To: <87y1tt2g1c.fsf@cbaines.net> X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Christopher, On Thu Oct 6, 2022 at 3:13 PM BST, Christopher Baines wrote: > Sorry for the delay in looking at this, I've gone ahead and pushed the > new packages now. Thanks! :D Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.3 FROM_ONE_CHAR Bogus FROM name -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 57721 Cc: 57721@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) Hi Christopher, On Thu Oct 6, 2022 at 3:13 PM BST, Christopher Baines wrote: > Sorry for the delay in looking at this, I've gone ahead and pushed the > new packages now. Thanks! :D > As for the service, it would be good to have a system test doing > something with it, I don't know how feasible it is? I have no idea either, but I suspect it's not feasible, since greetd itself doesn't have any system tests. > I'm happy to merge it though if it works. I haven't tested it, but if > someone could that would be useful. If that doesn't happen though, I'm > happy to merge it anyway. It works, I've tested it and have been using it for a while. > If you could send the remaining patch again (to the same issue), that > would be useful too. Okay, I've rebased it on the latest master and will send it independently. -- (