From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 07 10:10:13 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2022 14:10:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37002 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ogo3G-0003ps-F9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 10:10:13 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:56582) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ogo3E-0003pl-Cs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 10:10:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47216) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ogo32-0005sf-Qj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 10:10:01 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x736.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::736]:39602) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ogo2w-0001u9-6M; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 10:09:54 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-x736.google.com with SMTP id d10so510772qka.6; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 07:09:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CxoUeVhltKiW5saCv2xjAA7ssU+OQKIw5Gr3ReecN/s=; b=Zn0i0Un4uQlkqJy9z6bXeA8wDyYxt1kOKDDLaxfadk7lHNQ/l49Z1JhAslsYCbImzX DoaUVzfKE1727Byecj7vgAbgysPrtimmJqv2eqjpyimmDykSefOzmUB/jq9+OrKNVfdo TPzvA2aXUUdHdyh78FqTrCHoHmuybwvUrzAXpq9uhr6LNwtGwM7woOk2UF6dODI3qYLl 5pc1AVHBvSgMzeUs49mumG+oNcdbq3WY1RLguozoKFw0cQoR90FvINCetPVC9urbLJrd 6wWwWIMxKncDdVb7rBsG2G3A5vaNuqDtstUFonBMz2cc5NWv0w/23UHoBd3DYbVqK+2a RXzQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=CxoUeVhltKiW5saCv2xjAA7ssU+OQKIw5Gr3ReecN/s=; b=dDDzE3X2A7WWCdmjN7xgxf5uMgVG/qliXTA/15x0yuTch1reqk23O2nRM1FTeWZdJ4 SzT+iKf2T643rWamDxwjworNQ7V5kpbEBMMyRhnMkD5U6XoFZLLdLqXd/qSMhSXZbTCG QUoHaoChUS8CFRpGG5HGi9bqxxtkwl3QJt191mSgmL+2bNhfLXbRtfo/JP0oYHpnLA7Y K3iGwgAsn3S3BUID9T7WMb7eNHYVORgBo9b7GtZT5UPGllY7u5cOVFdzWh8xvTjWXWhI w27W/W6WW3Po6/XsbPeeJ6hy+p/rY64irYDlNc/jf9gtRaEdgMKvknqjpy9/lNe2t0Mr lWEg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf11SOKDD3LQtLfxpWpGJY2Vtuu00JH2dOSYNQJGVHBe4AuK6MCu FZ0nOAMoinX2bvXvGPqOWpKgnkj8sWxQfg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6a5IyMlnGHfkmUNdsJNBjByY5WsYT+lbschE5uyRZjWztKeePCCe8ahGfFrRE0lolXGY+i6g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4154:b0:6ce:a3c6:ac2e with SMTP id k20-20020a05620a415400b006cea3c6ac2emr3763069qko.14.1665151787412; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 07:09:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd ([2607:fad8:4:3::1005]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 189-20020a3703c6000000b006e48039927asm2021028qkd.83.2022.10.07.07.09.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 07 Oct 2022 07:09:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: phodina Subject: Re: [bug#57608] Upstreaming KDE Plasma and rest of packages References: <87h70wap7m.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <_9i_X2elmnmVduuEMWiqx4qwh8Jlu6wffrzRfrk0M2boZ-SINJbuBmUDidz8oMTRJhaeeNmsNGvDgNTbPRLyCy1EcDAYVk6nwNlliDDWy6M=@protonmail.com> <20221006182958.5d7f95a0@aria> <9smcBEFrJoUxSWXDb4goWIF4QOwiBIy6n7K6DwWb2HYjsX8HTNqPrvW5cGYba3NxMCK5trSEUy5-ky8ZxA9qkoMHrDTjAXzg6SzvdWCZ390=@protonmail.com> Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 10:09:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <9smcBEFrJoUxSWXDb4goWIF4QOwiBIy6n7K6DwWb2HYjsX8HTNqPrvW5cGYba3NxMCK5trSEUy5-ky8ZxA9qkoMHrDTjAXzg6SzvdWCZ390=@protonmail.com> (phodina@protonmail.com's message of "Fri, 07 Oct 2022 12:57:44 +0000") Message-ID: <87ilkv67yu.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::736; envelope-from=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk1-x736.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, phodina writes: >> On Thu, Oct 06 2022, 12:09:24 PM +0000 >> phodina via Guix-patches via >> >> > - The deal breaker is that Plasma DE does not work ... yet. X11 >> > displays black screen and wayland does not even [...] Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.0 MANY_TO_CC Sent to 10+ recipients 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (maxim.cournoyer[at]gmail.com) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: ludo@gnu.org, maximedevos@telenet.be, mail@brendan.scot, leo@famulari.name, kiasoc5 , marekpasnikowski@protonmail.com, marius@gnu.org, h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com, 57608@debbugs.gnu.org, phodina via Guix-patches via X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) Hi, phodina writes: >> On Thu, Oct 06 2022, 12:09:24 PM +0000 >> phodina via Guix-patches via guix-patches@gnu.org wrote: >> >> > - The deal breaker is that Plasma DE does not work ... yet. X11 >> > displays black screen and wayland does not even start. I have >> > dedicated machine where I intend to have a look into the issue by >> > strace, going through logs etc. >> >> >> Maybe https://issues.guix.gnu.org/57742 is a factor for blocking the >> wayland session? >> >> -- > > Thanks for the tip. > > Also there is issue with the KCM modules that they were not found. So > I had to patch package `extra-cmake-modules` and add more runtime Qt > dependencies. I think a basic, easy change we could do is restoring QT_PLUGIN_PATH for Qt6 *only*. This would fix things like wayland support, by having qtwayland available in the user profile, while providing some incentive to upgrade Qt5 packages to Qt6 :-). Still, requiring the user to manually install qtwayland in their user profile sounds suboptimal. Perhaps qt-build-system should simply propagate it? --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix size qtbase [...] total: 1419.4 MiB $ guix size qtwayland [...] total: 1575.9 MiB --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- So, a ~10% increase in size would mean qt applications just works, on either xorg or wayland sessions, right? And if we do it this way, we do not need to change any of the current QT_PLUGIN_PATH wrapping. Unless there are other Qt plugins that really make more sense to be used as plugins, rather than hard dependencies? -- Thanks, Maxim