From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 09 05:01:02 2022 Received: (at 57543) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Sep 2022 09:01:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60872 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oWZsj-0007np-Pc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 05:01:02 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f47.google.com ([209.85.167.47]:42606) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oWZsi-0007nM-Cx for 57543@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 05:01:00 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f47.google.com with SMTP id m15so1565993lfl.9 for <57543@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 02:01:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date; bh=L4jvQ6BV8ObPvHzQrQ3ekPm1DG3qPwz27lF8ecvCPv0=; b=K4LpROwy72Mzo4asventLjRZRw1x3dtHXtiRu3rh1U7ndHKSxQZgmA4p+Jn0W9unUS 21H0CFXLsuyZvN6i60zKYmyZqa65I3Liz7N8Qt+ByNR/rZJ/VyNhTPmZfjvuSgttFWA7 PBrm0hIx5zkAZkEuXlNAedA2hq0hV8RZ4X+jNIzGzozXU9G7LU6Tgu+PeiOClrnnFvvP xXBrGEG+Eaw33u+n1odmtZCDbnjrR37Ixk6XpoeFZEr2hCiwBcN2uRpRgYLie9NoWU4w KZdXHDB/mv0Xq91Kyys7JywrRkKrTMmpApyCtuxvpIqur9UJjp9um2kuPU/6k+SkoNQj mi5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=L4jvQ6BV8ObPvHzQrQ3ekPm1DG3qPwz27lF8ecvCPv0=; b=rwpR2KnWpPMp+ImmBNsF5lwr0ccCzqQIr7c/NdIK+rD8ibMzT+qtOjU1QDg71vx9TE szg1h87ES63aIxUJ/aZczjqE3NNfLEmNqcHJt4q1DmULAj+7+xC29+mK8wdVhGF4S73W GFV1B8NKeNWer7LhgWsCQAO98EaO5WVoTG6wCOK2F5hVV2y07AA0/Sv8jcfLa3Jpw/7k 4VDkNd4EvUKlWt+G7HALkkWaHFJEwU3CQiyZnAbGqJVHq/+zxzcRdavM3Fq3UQhYN6fX tGyt8eTLn5rMJdQiuvwNNtuTM5BISx53pu7L9ob97i9aEW8/p6AVqIe0czB2AYInFsIQ fpMA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3Lurfuv1XNAHhwtY2JJkUBCHM8vPCBFHZmWvpL5FJkIv35NG8Y 1axZKilj5NCqMvVK6mbtsjab/dnVd70PSl11 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4g5UvkTgaKpaOTHoOq+2LP8ydcBsmM7F8hQ6dRY8tf6AsRUqE+NEg3XDMxO7PyjiQ+fMhbYA== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5d2c:0:b0:493:221:f011 with SMTP id i12-20020ac25d2c000000b004930221f011mr3879573lfb.349.1662714054102; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 02:00:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guix-xps13 (95-29-44-37.broadband.corbina.ru. [95.29.44.37]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x10-20020ac259ca000000b00492e570e036sm2887lfn.54.2022.09.09.02.00.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 09 Sep 2022 02:00:53 -0700 (PDT) From: =?utf-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9_A=2E_Gomes?= To: Giovanni Biscuolo Subject: Re: bug#57543: emacs-telega is broken References: <87zgfido2k.fsf@gmail.com> <87czc57nrc.fsf@xelera.eu> Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 12:00:52 +0300 In-Reply-To: <87czc57nrc.fsf@xelera.eu> (Giovanni Biscuolo's message of "Thu, 08 Sep 2022 19:57:11 +0200") Message-ID: <87zgf8udkr.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 57543 Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 57543@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Giovanni Biscuolo writes: > Currently packaged emacs-telega is v.0.8.03, the > telega-tdlib-max-version defined for that version is "1.8.0" [1] > > The latest version of telega.el in master (defined as Version 0.8.44 in > metadata) [2]: it does support tdlib 1.8.4, but unfortunately uspream is > not releasing (via git tag) since v.0.8.03: should we use the commit > hash c547477be39298eabf8e67f0116a115771f2ee0b to upgrade emacs-telega to > the last upstream version? > > Meanwhile, since tdlib now is only used by emacs-telega[-server] we > should temporary revert this commit, unless there are security concerns. > > WDYT? Hi Giovanni, Thanks for investigating. I think you're right. Either reverting or updating the emacs-telega package definition (needs to be tested still). I'd revert it right away, since it's broken as of now. I don't have commit access. Ludovic, could you please do it? Thanks. --=20 Andr=C3=A9 A. Gomes "You cannot even find the ruins..."