From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 16 07:04:10 2022 Received: (at 57215) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2022 11:04:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45081 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oNuMj-0003qJ-R1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 07:04:10 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:41394) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oNuMg-0003q7-IG for 57215@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 07:04:08 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8010:68c1:0:54d1:d5d4:280e:f699]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1E5227BBE9; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 12:04:02 +0100 (BST) Received: from felis (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id c8613653; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 11:04:00 +0000 (UTC) References: <87v8qu1tv9.fsf@gnu.org> <87r11hd8bh.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtc5d64w.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmh0fwq5.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmh0injd.fsf@cbaines.net> <87r11gczov.fsf@gnu.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.6.11; emacs 28.1 From: Christopher Baines To: Mathieu Othacehe Subject: Re: bug#57215: ci: Fail to evaluate Guix specification Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 11:56:04 +0100 In-reply-to: <87r11gczov.fsf@gnu.org> Message-ID: <87leroih5x.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 57215 Cc: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , 57215@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Mathieu Othacehe writes: > Hey, > >> So, I think there's some involvement of grafts that mean you end up >> building things when just trying to compute the derivation. But that's >> as far as I got, I don't really understand why this is the case, or what >> can be done about it. > > Thanks for sharing Chris, I tried to disable grafts, but I was not able > to go any further: > > mathieu@berlin ~$ guix pull -s powerpc64le-linux -v3 --no-grafts ... > guix pull: error: build of `/gnu/store/z7jij9k33bl8dm50zrhy97jxqwylx1s8-compute-guix-derivation.drv' failed > > Maybe we should open a specific bug-report for that particular issue? I think the grafting comes in here [1], within the build-self.scm script, and I think that the --no-grafts argument to guix pull doesn't currently affect the behaviour at that point. 1: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/build-aux/build-self.scm#n350 That's where the patch here [2] comes in, as it makes it possible to control the grafting behaviour at that point, at least enough to demonstrate that there's some change in behaviour. 2: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-02/txtgzexu0El5b.txt --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmL7eZpfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9Xce0hAAsp5A3vvMWHMXZgez3sbhqzpzeEkFWHYV NRzdlMAwsatp6h1fhDTrYB8J/yAmw4mnx1XbwIT9u4r/8fP8wkts1DpEzScpIFhx UZjWnqb0cXfVV3xapT9WMmCEiul51rNdx7mpLTBPiGk7AEvicCfr3L3nwZOW/FlB Pf5LdnLmM+5hsAufh9M6rWTh6QTdNcuB/qJmpN3tfbcu88WmW+n2zAaVgH7Q2p94 0Uvtmm6zHP1eVgcdIVKwQQckehUVlbxMoIPRK2GCg0cy220MzjIhCKZHc1SEkZh4 3BKUxsppDost6CRqkjQEo+sSJXcbTLJ3kQSJhfUFT7OWwGyqw8Rpqrevm5FJXzmi EChs9lPNNrwRnY6xC1GqpQX305Gtrm1n0UmhEWLDt82k9FVWN+s/8P59FUgLSfdB +b+6A91KnegJwPspqIDpxeLfsFPe0/RBV/StufgSEh5r01bCJmCc+en1nSexCtz8 eDS1Mj3avHPx3QkD3DEeS5/YTYlJAeewZX/cXIPsDVNnAlMwqJZwxpEyfxScbCeO lVgGbUrsvEx0xsHRheW5U9/RNUMfimYn14481XNt2u7qQVl2iaCQHq3XLKmOYiFG 5p41vUDlvFWY6Rx0D+iPryLaz31DXig/7q0oRSouUbOoywqs4Y8V4UF2olSFfo7K w9ljZoR6seo= =kNu4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--