From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 08 09:00:45 2022 Received: (at 57055) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Aug 2022 13:00:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39454 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oL2NA-0005Gg-UY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 09:00:45 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:37083) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oL2N6-0004tb-E1 for 57055@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 09:00:42 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 330F7240027 for <57055@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 15:00:33 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1659963634; bh=+mQbEr6l5fMnh3kUSA936wfB+ZG720Q4RWbcl45kNvk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=rQnbM+EzdeOo2Bu1IfHxaRcXyhWtBzVVwDKY+GXp8SOnVbLVwXdIOuTum4pwkCg4B 0FD6yq5HyCUP4CmmU5hXBADIU5khIbRS/8yraMEGQ4Y4Mm6jttBrIxEb7uw0hNqA52 ObKMOKfczMjCZ1/uGV6QsLBbt2I4+uXaPwlq4mcSpJ3T9kce0/R0DsKCrYLs9dNJ/N d9aaJ3VOIoGgbPDJZvZpqH+3oYFkh5C4zhuE+pptjog5KkOwC7AI++IsjtAEq9X3Yh QmvxDgzAkH2Btfo+6iBbYdbanQ7hdQpglh5Z43Nmxjv77EcnibG9V7qiz4BMnrQh7g sR4iMlflDFrOw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4M1bsX3ghhz9rxL; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 15:00:31 +0200 (CEST) References: <20220808083254.16059-1-pukkamustard@posteo.net> <20220808083601.16323-1-pukkamustard@posteo.net> <20220808083601.16323-2-pukkamustard@posteo.net> <5ac83e05-863f-7d81-6f86-b738a7ae3fa2@telenet.be> From: pukkamustard To: Maxime Devos Subject: Re: [bug#57055] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add guile-srfi-146. Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2022 12:43:38 +0000 In-reply-to: <5ac83e05-863f-7d81-6f86-b738a7ae3fa2@telenet.be> Message-ID: <86y1vy7uvq.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 57055 Cc: 57055@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Maxime Devos writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > > On 08-08-2022 10:36, pukkamustard wrote: >> + (inputs (list guile-3.0)) > > guile-3.0 is used as a compiler, so it needs to be in native-inputs.=C2=A0 > Does "guix build guile-srfi-146 --target=3Daarch64-linux-gnu" (or with > another target) work? It does not! Adding guile-3.0 to both native-inputs and inputs seems to solve this (also for guile-srfi-158). However, I then get following error: ``` no code for module (srfi srfi-128) ``` guile-srfi-128 is built using the guile-build-system. Maybe something not working properly with guile-build-system and cross-compilation? Do you have any ideas or suggestions on how to fix this? >> + (license license:lgpl3+))) > > There are also some (ISC?) bits on > . Yes, the sample SRFI implementation is licensed under ISC. Afaiu, there's no problem in relicensing this as LGPL-3.0-or-later. I think a lot of the guile-srfi-* libraries do this. > Also, Guix does not yet install the 'LICENSES' subdirectory, see > . Noted. Cheers, pukkamustard