Am Donnerstag, dem 04.08.2022 um 21:22 +0800 schrieb Hilton Chain: > From cc7ad551bd68535554d350891efc2bdaf1351472 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Hilton Chain > Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 20:00:17 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH 2/7] gnu: font-lxgw-wenkai: Use English for synopsis > and >  description. > > * gnu/packages/fonts.scm (font-lxgw-wenkai)[synopsis]: Use English. > [description]: Use English. > --- >  gnu/packages/fonts.scm | 5 +++-- >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/fonts.scm b/gnu/packages/fonts.scm > index 3a217a54b2..b7796eedc2 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/fonts.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/fonts.scm > @@ -2725,9 +2725,10 @@ (define-public font-lxgw-wenkai >                  > "17li3xry4j4ccdnwz2pcnf0gv7c5mwq0h5fwvl7ar28brn2qgdbk")))) >      (build-system font-build-system) >      (home-page "https://lxgw.github.io/2021/01/28/Klee-Simpchin/") > -    (synopsis "LXGW Wenkai / 霞鹜文楷") > +    (synopsis "LXGW Wenkai") Note that the name of the font is not a good synopsis :) >      (description > -     "An open-source Chinese font derived from Fontworks' Klee > One.") > +     "LXGW Wenkai is an open-source Chinese font derived from > Fontworks' Klee > +One.") This problem does exist in the original description as well, but marketing terms such as "open-source" ought to be avoided. Looking at Klee One [1], which is also SIL-OFL, one might perhaps call this a Chinese handwriting font? Cheers [1] https://github.com/fontworks-fonts/Klee