From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 31 09:30:42 2022 Received: (at 56852) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jul 2022 13:30:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36554 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oI91m-0007tA-30 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2022 09:30:42 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:39514) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oI91f-0007sv-Sp for 56852@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2022 09:30:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=ZrIltiTNdkpZc TS3Ul3XHcCO4TFDRi8OHXJKHxwdGm8=; h=in-reply-to:date:subject:cc:to: from:references; d=tobias.gr; b=ZaA8V6433DPj4Hs9KAQBrbTbEgKrAPDdiUwqpr ievTYkHXaQp5pcgRnUKW/GFSiC/L1TxOR3n6W4mihf2cRwj69DfbX0ARAQPEkU6a3nnosr zJlP72HqBDZQ7BJUuIRBWWBa1AyvMzzp0rU9e7vh0L01B2/IZWjdWpwFvZ4wuoxdvOCzg5 w3kU1HzjGLclDuFJb78yYMhEMwgpt3bnWhLA9tgivhQlI5b0rVX0AQt73xQWdKNRixEkBA X6EO44nLLossfIbC4aNGudiKdMIwVk3kdieZHaexc77BBan4ijuFqda6XlO/4x9TTSy6TW x1jvFvjovxrwAGK7nWwGnkKw== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 346e00d6 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sun, 31 Jul 2022 13:30:31 +0000 (UTC) References: <20220731104635.31835-1-me@tobias.gr> From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: "(" Subject: Re: [bug#56852] [PATCH] gnu: Add exult. Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2022 15:26:19 +0200 In-reply-to: BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; Message-ID: <87ilndxvd5@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56852 Cc: 56852@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ( =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > I don't think it's really necessary to justify the use of Git=20 > here, since Git > is preferred over tarballs anyway. Agreed insofar as I just wanted to point out the surprising lack=20 of bootstrapping in the tarball, and then hey, 80 characters is 80=20 characters, what else can we chat about before they run out. If=20 it's read as =E2=80=98justifying=E2=80=99 anything, that was not the intent= ion. I'm not sure we ever reached consensus on preferring Git? I'm=20 pro-git myself, but if there's consensus we should advertise it=20 more prominently. Thanks for the review! Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCYuaD9g0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15oCoBAOjmnMFEnfwRIQKOikHUPMvr+FxxiyDji7HcsqVQ bi2UAQCAezfv5OwsJZ42yWCHm1rad7MryZe1BPitEwnRpVrXCA== =/8pF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--