From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 15 21:38:17 2022 Received: (at 56382) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jul 2022 01:38:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42542 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oCWl7-0002Jj-Dq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 21:38:17 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f170.google.com ([209.85.160.170]:34727) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oCWl5-0002JS-LC for 56382@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 21:38:16 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f170.google.com with SMTP id e5so5057705qts.1 for <56382@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 18:38:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rNtOcPBYnINtvu8w1IQkVAflWnY/IH6MxK71NimaaEE=; b=lq/RkcTtOO6FJviPl731WWrCOb/KJFZ4CsY+oKGTTVgGypzReyifrt1mb9fFiHp4H8 IRVrEJRJPbruPg6E4cM7V5LORbFDydOdtAVmF79qkET/1H5Uw5FFJSdQfuid++BI3ZUD m8S3v2ZMsYqF7YgcnfdHCagA9pPV9YbUt/nZGxHwQHZH6S93wCkcdEAH8GzRJs80ff43 PJI5dMf4FXnY/Tx0ifgh+/RtO/rhFtCdSQcDOibgQlPYkqETe8URIu3BlXc2b411uvqu HGf3DI308vqo8txp5oE8LM1AkV/GYsaq3y56INmADjSaSAFJw7atpI3sc5ym8PtBsY2Y mC/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rNtOcPBYnINtvu8w1IQkVAflWnY/IH6MxK71NimaaEE=; b=jvQOjw3MOe9wPppLl+KgoZ3Nj56avxLUsrbHJd6iDNdMWR/J0B4Gt4S6gVD1JW14Oi fmqokOnUlrFCZMIhhq6mk4m54avNHZjs8uoWPOqj5buqWPamstxQRTbCbYm6rtyt1Zi+ kRGXT+GiiIZNR4dn/IgU2B8lBTwwcJGHgg3otRIJJtZpTRosLhOZvdjYeF9WSyNpdpbZ JpaT7csV+fGQk3PdAAQYNvdQZeJnpBH1TgY+s3KVp0I3/NKuKHDOBWiO2LYrUfpTanVJ FHi2vwgTYi3H9091+sfzkwv7KQhui/+sqWaSgxmkKMUJ50kk48kl1cxXh0nesZo/YrGk FAnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9HNIhXe1SPZdVX4ibZGirIGLHZJBv4EBEneRFMAj/JpdspcSBX ZapMX8rhHKgyAd/lTgt4eJGhRBizIJ4y4w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tGLArW4ziSCyct6rOLAuhi4MlOkAjZ8J+MoFjpjqWsrxGYfnKIzqdxKEKnQTt+6YPEps792Q== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:584d:0:b0:31e:e631:ddc2 with SMTP id h13-20020ac8584d000000b0031ee631ddc2mr157673qth.617.1657935490077; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 18:38:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-205-233-125-176.b2b2c.ca. [205.233.125.176]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id cn11-20020a05622a248b00b0031eb00e6fc9sm4667760qtb.32.2022.07.15.18.38.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 15 Jul 2022 18:38:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: [bug#56382] [PATCH] gnu: gajim: Use hicolor-icon-theme to avoid crashing on startup References: <87sfn6asfz.fsf@gnu.org> <877d4e8r79.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 21:38:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <877d4e8r79.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Fri, 15 Jul 2022 15:02:02 +0200") Message-ID: <87tu7hsupr.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56382 Cc: Raghav Gururajan , 56382@debbugs.gnu.org, Morgan.J.Smith@outlook.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Ludovic, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi, > > "Raghav Gururajan" skribis: > >>> Does simply adding =E2=80=98hicolor-icon-theme=E2=80=99 to =E2=80=98inp= uts=E2=80=99 fix the issue? >> >> Most gtk-based apps expect hicolor-icon-theme and adwaita-icon-theme to = be in the profile. Adding these in either system or user profile would prev= ent this error from occurring. > > Right, so the proposed patch (adding =E2=80=98hicolor-icon-theme=E2=80=99= to =E2=80=98inputs=E2=80=99, > not =E2=80=98propagated-inputs=E2=80=99) shouldn=E2=80=99t make any diffe= rence I guess? I think it works as inputs because of our wrappers (perhaps XDG_DATA_DIRS)? But it's kind at odds with our policy which is to let users manage icons themselves. Probably because of #20255 that wouldn't help currently (system and user profiles are not merged), but if we fixed that bug we could make the situation better by adding 'hicolor-icon-theme' to the default packages of our desktop system templates. Thanks, Maxim