From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 01 10:22:46 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jul 2022 14:22:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38805 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7HXi-00026s-1d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 10:22:46 -0400 Received: from icts-p-cavuit-1.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.132]:45230) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7HXU-00026N-Q4; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 10:22:35 -0400 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: maxime.devos@student.kuleuven.be X-Spam-Status: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-48.734, required 5, autolearn=disabled, RCVD_SMTPS -50.00, RDNS_NONE 1.27, SPF_HELO_NONE 0.00, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED 0.00) X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: 43D64206F5.A72E5 X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from icts-p-ceifnet-smtps-1.kuleuven.be (icts-p-ceifnet-smtps.service.icts.svcd [IPv6:2a02:2c40:0:51:145:242:ac11:10]) by icts-p-cavuit-1.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D64206F5; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 16:22:30 +0200 (CEST) BCmilterd-Mark-Subject: no BCmilterd-Errors: BCmilterd-Report: SA-HVU#OURIPS#-35.00 X-CAV-Cluster: smtps Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX6.luna.kuleuven.be (unknown [10.112.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by icts-p-ceifnet-smtps-1.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28998D4FCF52C; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 16:22:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX1.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.9) by ICTS-S-EXMBX6.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.32; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 16:22:29 +0200 Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX1.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::800:1455:b0d3:d5c2]) by ICTS-S-EXMBX1.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::800:1455:b0d3:d5c2%18]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.033; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 16:22:29 +0200 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Maxime Devos To: "control@debbugs.gnu.org" , "56319@debbugs.gnu.org" <56319@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Re: 'guix system' failure due to substitute being temporarily 404 -> Implement a retry attempts? Thread-Topic: 'guix system' failure due to substitute being temporarily 404 -> Implement a retry attempts? Thread-Index: AQHYjVTBKV/jIkTTQUuuHfUN5EKSxA== Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 14:22:29 +0000 Message-ID: <1656685348683.68627@student.kuleuven.be> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.112.50.1] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) merge 56005 56320 56319=0A= thanks=0A= =0A= This doesn't look Guix System-specific to me and looks to have the same iss= ue (i.e., something about write_wait_fd) as=0A= , so merging into 56005.=0A= =0A= Also, is the substitute server being down a hypothesis for the error but no= t actually known to actually have hapend, or something you have noticed the= substitute server being down via other methods and believe it to be a plau= sible hypothesis for the error cause?=0A= =0A= In all cases, I believe write_wait_fd: unimplemented to be a bug that needs= to be investigated for the root cause and fixed, not something to accumula= te work-arounds for and ignore by automatic retries.=0A= =0A= Greetings,=0A= Maxime.=0A= =0A=