From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 05 11:16:58 2022 Received: (at 56300) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jul 2022 15:16:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51276 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o8kIL-000820-6a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2022 11:16:58 -0400 Received: from mout-p-202.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.172]:52556) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o8isQ-0005LI-Hn for 56300@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2022 09:46:08 -0400 Received: from smtp202.mailbox.org (smtp202.mailbox.org [10.196.197.202]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-202.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LckTf24ttz9sYf; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 15:45:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Samuel Fadel To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , 56300@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: [bug#56300] [PATCH] gnu: Added breeze-gtk package. In-Reply-To: <94786677-7FBC-4C15-9E59-0A04EABF818D@tobias.gr> References: <87sfnnxzv8.fsf@t490> <94786677-7FBC-4C15-9E59-0A04EABF818D@tobias.gr> Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2022 15:45:56 +0200 Message-ID: <878rp7n04r.fsf@p14s> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56300 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 05 Jul 2022 11:16:56 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi Tobias, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice (2022-06-29 18:21 +0000): > Re: the licence: you could specify only lgpl2.1 as that's the result > of combining lgpl2.1 with bsd-3, but you can also specify both in a > (list ...) with comments next to each one to explain what applies to > which file(s). I prepared a new patch, but accidentally submitted it as a new issue on its own (id 56321). Should I merge it here or do I merge this older one there? Best, Samuel