From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 30 05:32:21 2022 Received: (at 56197) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jun 2022 09:32:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32876 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o6qX7-0001fa-DN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 05:32:21 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:41636) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o6qX5-0001Zz-Bg for 56197@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 05:32:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=a/jH/+PRnukmGa0lNnDKdX21hFSWQTaGJpA3t31CrRo=; b=Is6UHc9xjv2yF974AgyjgQdnQD gVxKalZJnNtdjYwmpHln5ZZQMn8zDUCgeKCr1ZrTO6ti6Z9QWcbxGKhSrPMhVtftHg7w8Ofv/Q5ui /8n11dS5qtSwliyuAMmFVvqOItP4aXnf4Dl4fgZRuz4oyVe2NjYr7b0PXzmH/utk2DqI=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o6qWw-0001r3-Hn; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 11:32:13 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Kangas Subject: Re: bug#56197: 28.1; lisp-fill-paragraph result regressed with Emacs 28 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:03:11 -0700") References: <87zgi2xcgm.fsf@gmail.com> <87y1xlj6wn.fsf@gnus.org> <834k08c3se.fsf@gnu.org> <874k08kj31.fsf@gnus.org> <87y1xkj4co.fsf@gnus.org> <87tu88j3tf.fsf@gnus.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAG1BMVEXi39X09O9/fXoT FhkfIyYaHSGhop5UWF3////zlsy2AAAAAWJLR0QIht6VegAAAAd0SU1FB+YGHgkNILJe4jkAAAGO SURBVDjLdZO7bcQwDIbJJrV4RSa4CSIbHsDWBJL7MxBkgStu/fAnJflxCQsb0Ce+flJEIkK3YUmL WkrrWh5EJIECvgrclBQ9ZwUCuw1lWd0KgMBDTUOt3QpXQIHD5wWweei3guIA9wnJic4e/wE981B0 zYG7oh4S5BJKq0IBag5yA+rC3uDnaH0XfAa26xUMFaSyoA/EghtCFRdrtuTswMqtQOX1MCalJ8cx 8ls54i0ey+1A//wnaKEQfk0VBE2uzKqK45LieAxF4mDIMUYHPlqfh4LpGWN2DyZfBgfbdwcBwLRS MP3c5wbEgXnMXx+vOZ77sOTzSK/cgSlVq4qPO3JkAMKqoA/NkSeAPVSfIOaBxvMOGB5q0aTKV49m mcmz8BvwCWK7aqh1D6XScnjzEFusQ6g8VsCuSd9Eq7ZXRbjgYHoeQaiSHDx84TDcWlX12Mj2SoJc ADtog9rL3Rg9EMZLHZTRcwTxF9oAXnsDchJRCzure9XKRQzhrJXpTnijZxG3uj/SJfGHkzcL9Qvo IsmzFT370QAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAyMi0wNi0zMFQwOToxMzozMiswMDowMFi2hwQA AAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjItMDYtMzBUMDk6MTM6MzIrMDA6MDAp6z+4AAAAAElFTkSu QmCC X-Now-Playing: Andrew Poppy's _Alphabed_: "Goodbye Mr G" Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 11:32:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87r136cx9j.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Kangas writes: > The former sounds more useful, IMO. I don't want to mess up my strings > just to have pretty source code; I can make such adjustments manually > when I need to. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56197 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 56197@debbugs.gnu.org, maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Stefan Kangas writes: > The former sounds more useful, IMO. I don't want to mess up my strings > just to have pretty source code; I can make such adjustments manually > when I need to. So the votes are in, and I guess we'll keep the current behaviour in Emacs 29, and I'm therefore closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no