From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 04 16:09:05 2022 Received: (at 56145) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jul 2022 20:09:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48719 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o8SNR-000099-Fn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2022 16:09:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34700) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o8SNK-00008i-Tg for 56145@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2022 16:09:00 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40846) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o8SNE-0002Y8-Vd; Mon, 04 Jul 2022 16:08:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=HTlkDQpF7D0naeomBnwz1QHpRDJjmAvh1sO/3tltSmg=; b=UPbladIfiSEhENnHn98K raZ7keQ5UwxtCTnqmZnqCQwkZM7YSH6v9kLR7QeUU+dhk0wWW9N9QXLOyz5Vv42ouUnX16U9Ah86O zbAuNzUSd3PSx4iTY39NxW+2YPu3sfaOsfQivdk+Q+PjOdwzqhMl0AVlEXoACDrtQQ2Mw6GCTprTo yIJ2w7aA/in5Nuad8TJcn6mRdEqk9XdwgXqSuN1JbpsrplzgHBAltIU/sdZVnQ+K73tmqBp4qP2dp fgEL9oSouGbNR9HR0CoFCkcpzPW082zKpIPeF4nMfHUItHD4qjVIkrMrYFkbiCbyt9YeSZALIKzMv ZwX5WAFfjJ0/zA==; Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net ([91.160.117.201]:52368 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o8SNE-0004gb-Jo; Mon, 04 Jul 2022 16:08:48 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Hartmut Goebel Subject: Re: bug#56145: [PATCH 0/5] Add menus to Services sub-sections References: <201f3aa5e409f45423ec30187f37ee56cc0f7716.1655908912.git.h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com> <874jzy1nx3.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <92089bc8-c60e-aa33-b285-807d4fc7992f@crazy-compilers.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Sextidi 16 Messidor an 230 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9vo?= =?utf-8?Q?lution=2C?= jour du Tabac X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2022 22:08:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: <92089bc8-c60e-aa33-b285-807d4fc7992f@crazy-compilers.com> (Hartmut Goebel's message of "Mon, 4 Jul 2022 16:30:14 +0200") Message-ID: <87a69o8wts.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56145 Cc: 56145@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, Hartmut Goebel skribis: > Am 03.07.22 um 12:38 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s: > >> I=E2=80=99m less convinced about this one. I wonder if, instead of addi= ng >> anchors, we should add proper sectioning at the same level as the >> existing sections (=E2=80=9CBase Services=E2=80=9D, etc.). > I don't actually understand what you mean. Currently each section > described one or more services. The section groups the services into > =E2=80=9Eall LDAP related=E2=80=98, =E2=80=9Eall X11 related=E2=80=9C, et= c. This patch basically adds > the anchors, whereas the other patch uses the anchors that already > exist. So basically they result in the same. > > Do you suggest to split =E2=80=9EBase Services=E2=80=9D into several sect= ions? (Like > =E2=80=9EConsole service=E2=80=9C, =E2=80=9CRandow data services=E2=80=98= , etc.) > >> Also, I don=E2=80=99t think we need one section (or anchor) per service: > > Having a TOC of all services is my actual intention. I want to have a > list which (Incomplete sentence.) To be clear: I think we must not abuse sectioning to make an index; there=E2=80=99s already an index, and we can add concept index entries if t= hat=E2=80=99s what=E2=80=99s missing. However, what we could/should do is improve structure. We can do that by grouping related services together, essentially splitting existing sections into finer-grain sections=E2=80=94e.g., =E2=80=98Base Services=E2= =80=99 might be split into two or three sections. That=E2=80=99s not the same as adding one head= ing and one anchor for each service. Does that make sense? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.