( schreef op zo 12-06-2022 om 11:41 [+0100]: > This is standard wording for Go package descriptions: "Package xxx > implements yyy". No, it doesn't make sense :) This documentation bug is common. That doesn't make it correct (*,**). Even if it was standard, standard can be incorrect and subject to improving. If a practice doesn't make sense, then that practice needs to be changed. (*) Lack of an article is not incorrect per se, but we don't have space limitations in the description field, so no need to compress the description by leaving out articles. (**) E.g., there is a wide-spread (standard?) cross-compilation bug in the use of 'wrap-program', which is more often than not used incorrectly, see . This does not make it somehow correct. Greetings, Maxime