From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 08 12:29:54 2022 Received: (at 55833) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jun 2022 16:29:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44056 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nyyZ7-0008Qa-Rp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2022 12:29:54 -0400 Received: from mail-4018.proton.ch ([185.70.40.18]:48715) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nyyZ2-0008QM-SA for 55833@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2022 12:29:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 16:29:36 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=elenq.tech; s=protonmail2; t=1654705781; x=1654964981; bh=e5R9NbP5cUw+PnicbhPbl7nwHvg7jikWKKQkGWA//9w=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To: Feedback-ID:Message-ID; b=Jt49FGoYdKVJEJumm2GYv1ZdyN3v5xTCTD4uQEqFy0WYNbdwKuAVJtZ62qqG2qhG+ wxIFVV5ENAcqbq3L90opceMkzJWqIHDttjgKlGIZoun6Y3CldR9W2vpgJxcsgBu9Kf SOaHI3Mv36HDzXHoKq0E1xf586ocm7ZEtzQonmNIXPhc2vr7K+RANuUEpIq7txJXT0 mI1dCAmeT7pCS5D7kSwov9Qq/ymbUhzXIyRBZYftgetgTpcI5DvyE9V9r4ABBJEe19 6zp4xhBLgU7yMC/nbI1kLM6oeJAUcZfi20h53UPiTIwzI39+UjNnKMOdsKCV1lFHgC XKD+GvoGh5wcQ== To: Maxime Devos From: Ekaitz Zarraga Subject: Re: bug#55833: cross-base error: wrong type argument in position 1 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <5qR8o5eSldiy3chXSPnE2qn1NtHm4FklEGx9APhm0xFagHrv8fZapayVEMvdtJ4Kqw6vTwbyu3rCyPc38oEbJq78X2XW7RwWoe3DzND_K_w=@elenq.tech> Feedback-ID: 3263582:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 55833 Cc: othacehe@gnu.org, 55833@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Ekaitz Zarraga Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, > * use "riscv64-linux-gnu" instead of "riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu" > (as expected by (guix platforms riscv)). There's an slight problem with that. I tried to do it and I can't build my custom gcc without sending the full triplet (with -unknown) and if I make the other parts of the system, like binutils without the -unknown part, the gcc is unable to find `ld`. I have to dig on this further but it looks like this has further effects on the system. Best, Ekaitz