From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 24 04:24:14 2022 Received: (at 55343-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2022 08:24:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40792 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o4ebq-0001B0-RQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 04:24:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53666) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o4ebl-0001AM-WC for 55343-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 04:24:10 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57826) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o4ebd-0004n8-Tg; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 04:23:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=YKMhZAU1nCqUhaffd9jgi67jYyk95DiQnVrZMq1K6qE=; b=DRg/5ZiROFGFDtBAIjIc HKVh7IDXiZ9njTQJ3ssyePFajLtUe3Vahi+db+b7Aot2Pc5XpFQBLb25EU80gKjGdPgHkBBkTdf2j dYtsI3lo1wNpMKzHy5XmRmsnR0rO+6PAuGL2LV1TKM18fLK43wFmMRF6gXlH7aZl9VE3cDrckEEAs vGMF3pjqIuwfy6TOSywDW+3uOXGAjpMEKKqNX6Hob4iREqzmhOT+r3V2MjXvp0ccJ3KK3kJPHL2xl nxeOu62VxiGN26PevQNQEwWoCQeNakWmSU1TyNrmZUHlU5t24MExSv0X0EmQB+SJoCrBTBAd+AgFN IRoNAVoBw+GLOg==; Received: from [2a01:cb18:832e:5f00:3563:417e:2a38:86d8] (port=36154 helo=meije) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o4ebc-0005aJ-Uf; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 04:23:57 -0400 From: Mathieu Othacehe To: Timothy Sample Subject: Re: bug#55343: Add support for 32bit UEFI References: <20220510011812.15710e0b@primarylaptop.localdomain> <20220509232451.30605-1-GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org> <20220509232451.30605-2-GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org> <20220511190023.527dacfa@primarylaptop.localdomain> <73c23088990ce1751410d24ecc84580c9811fe2a.camel@telenet.be> <20220518155003.4ef86460@primarylaptop.localdomain> <20220611184135.7bf2ce49@primarylaptop.localdomain> <874k0jdo30.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87fsk25z2s.fsf@ngyro.com> <87o7yolbmo.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 10:23:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87o7yolbmo.fsf@gnu.org> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Sun, 19 Jun 2022 21:02:55 +0200") Message-ID: <87r13ejwpx.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 55343-done Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Maxime Devos , Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli , 55343-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hey, > This way we could get rid of the grub-efi32 package and rely only on > the grub-efi package. We would need to come up with something > similar for the aarch64-linux Grub package I guess. I tried to do that, turns out Grub doesn't have support for building modules for multiple architectures in a single pass. You need to call configure and make for each architecture. Having a dedicated grub-efi32 doesn't seem so bad after all. I pushed the patchset, thanks! Mathieu