On 5/5/22 16:33, Maxime Devos wrote: > Philip McGrath schreef op do 05-05-2022 om 14:53 [-0400]: >> Another scenario that might be worth considering is projects that follow >> the REUSE specification[1], which I don't think would be handled by the >> current install-license-files. > > It doesn't copy .reuse/dep5 and LICENSES yet, though that can be > implemented: . I don't think that > helps for this particular package though, given that Racket doesn't > ship those files. > Right, it wouldn't help Racket, it was just another example of a case not handled by the current implementation. (Though I think it would be much more justifiable to add a special case for REUSE than for Racket.) Glad people are already thinking about it! -Philip