From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 07 08:47:57 2022 Received: (at 55221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 May 2022 12:47:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50748 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nnJqn-0000Gs-0B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 08:47:57 -0400 Received: from mail-4022.proton.ch ([185.70.40.22]:31331) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nnJqk-0000Fy-Sc for 55221@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 08:47:56 -0400 Date: Sat, 07 May 2022 12:47:40 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apatience.com; s=protonmail2; t=1651927667; bh=vzNvezD0glzWvsH3PYSbuLVOl2l9D7bqeduUq22V1VM=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To: Feedback-ID:Message-ID; b=o37TAHok0V94BFl9KpmHsz1EN3dDChW4rfLeIFC9d7DEmAGnaQJpoysjGNJwAJpqI EjXrFvZvAgCgQLjyvRd0wZ7hzyGfgnNGObZc/A0Lo1owkAiFNOAxufAYWp6OseC7It L3atjlxJbkTZgO9I3Q4iAzX/4iIX+4FkmEpmRKSXi6W96N9suBCvY52APiR60ItHvK wUaNPo4PYlIerYtqSc0iDCY10LK1U8nr89FxELFN0zdA/FDu9zzeL68Q+iWnUjxrZc vawPVNauVJmqhOTtWdvLBL2FncZOxkbAsYCyE6bds8AV/4yQ2dPC+V7IajsAKLioIP YvQvXk8T6MzCg== To: Julien Lepiller From: "Paul A. Patience" Subject: Re: [bug#55221] [PATCH] gnu: font-iosevka: Update to 15.2.0. Message-ID: <87mtft1pcn.fsf@apatience.com> In-Reply-To: <20220507092744.7d1bfb0d@sybil.lepiller.eu> References: <20220502114438.556664-1-paul@apatience.com> <20220507092744.7d1bfb0d@sybil.lepiller.eu> Feedback-ID: 19227857:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 55221 Cc: 55221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: "Paul A. Patience" Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On 2022-05-07 03:27:44-04:00, Julien Lepiller wrote: > LGTM, but why reverse the lists at the end of the guix repl script? I guess just so you can visually follow the hashes in the same order as you update them in the packages. I hadn't bothered with 'reverse' when writing the initial REPL script, but the dissonance bothered me this time ;). Best regards, Paul