André A. Gomes skribis: > Guillaume Le Vaillant writes: > >> When testing this updated sbcl I found out that it has a bug breaking >> the sbcl-lzlib package (maybe others too). I reported it upstream and >> they managed to fix it (https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/1971088). >> >> We could add a patch for the fix to sbcl 2.2.4, or just wait a few weeks >> for the next release. > > This is not exactly on topic but I'm wondering how should I proceed in > the future. I checked that there was a new sbcl release, tried to build > locally and it succeeded. What else should I do? Thanks. After checking that the updated sbcl builds fine, you can also check all the packages depending on sbcl with a command like: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- ./pre-inst-env guix build $(./pre-inst-env guix refresh -l sbcl | cut -d ':' -f 2) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > Perhaps we could wait until the next release. Ok. I'm closing this issue then, and you can open a new one to update to sbcl 2.2.5 (or maybe 2.3.0?) when it it released (probably near the end of May or beginning of June if upstream keeps the same release schedule).