From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 01 18:22:18 2022 Received: (at 55030) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2022 22:22:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34452 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nlHxK-0007l3-MK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2022 18:22:18 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:56731) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nlHxI-0007kq-Ns for 55030@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2022 18:22:17 -0400 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88DA5C009B; Sun, 1 May 2022 18:22:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 01 May 2022 18:22:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= philipmcgrath.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1651443731; x=1651530131; bh=7iOWwP5Y9I j8h+UmEnk09z8zmDWaHNOKGuD4NmrKfng=; b=bWmwkDtQzbMDpfM3gqjmisMfw/ 4KVvSk+WIGfwUzTftYL2vgKE7ylSNhtMpSS2rJLQcpFJAo0k3S9estUF77gn2+ML 4++3pUNJxmFYdGaYhtE83E/9ToaRYoDIWvwGhtHvCnxWyj85+/y6RnoZWCyfiTCG /4+vh1bq5OstVnzy8lb195OJrZbqIi0BjFkCHnkzqlyTmCHtJZvdjhG9K4x3tUhp HTI/XToGVd74pKHPVgo+myg5vdNJ08V1V5+DtMu8H4v0KBYcERFyfxE1ugOcr8p1 hui4VL1yxeclYJjS8VSlLHqmQn3bvaNu0WTe+jiCEyats8XqkH68SdNkjSag== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1651443731; x=1651530131; bh=7iOWwP5Y9Ij8h +UmEnk09z8zmDWaHNOKGuD4NmrKfng=; b=crXy+afZ8ZzeCWlh3PcOGx20lH6io xCA1hOLFfcrNux9yfUvzm8Yr4xXtoO6/S5UNhmyd4UcvOSyKoQ8JBn2wzjFEtV4q 452FNrYvPrTZo9endXcpPgRA9zAn2HwcT86hYqrCSfEIX91hIN5Hks66wr98l/uX Lzygs9K8+CV46Hhn+TXtKdk7yuzYJfI6srKKY4clOyk+11tFWyt237WZ9KqtTii3 7Jkvk5sal4vVJcmhE24xp9nxdvrDTnz84GhP2XzbASHBuds5G/5jTy43vAbiqF9u +LRgpEnMWKypP/iO01+D3ZkA6sgxt86JahePdsvyF/4m8FD7q0yxxijLQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrvdeggddtlecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefkffggfgfuvfevfhfhjggtgfesthekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomheprfhhihhl ihhpucfotgfirhgrthhhuceophhhihhlihhpsehphhhilhhiphhmtghgrhgrthhhrdgtoh hmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeetgfdvudfgtdeihedutdfgueelteegffffgeegjeei udetleefieduudethfdvueenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecuvehluh hsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepphhhihhlihhpsehp hhhilhhiphhmtghgrhgrthhhrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 1 May 2022 18:22:11 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 1 May 2022 18:22:10 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1 Subject: Re: bug#55030: [PATCH 00/30] gnu: elm: Update to 0.19.1. Add build system & importer. Content-Language: en-US To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=c3=a8s?= References: <20220419232736.272970-1-philip@philipmcgrath.com> <87k0b52ec3.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8up0yv4.fsf_-_@gnu.org> From: Philip McGrath In-Reply-To: <87v8up0yv4.fsf_-_@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 55030 Cc: 55030@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi, On 5/1/22 16:41, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > I sent a few comments to individual patches that probably warrant a v2, > but overall I think the patch series is almost ready to go. > > Thanks! > > Ludo’. Thanks for taking a look! I have a few other things to wrap up before I return to this, but I'll put together a v2 relatively soon. Tangentially, I learned after sending this series about a Rust-based runner [1] for "elm-explorations/test" tests, which may be easier for us to package than the Node.js-based runner.[2] Still, I'd probably save that for some future patch series. -Philip [1]: https://github.com/mpizenberg/elm-test-rs [2]: https://github.com/rtfeldman/node-test-runner