From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 02 08:47:52 2022 Received: (at 54760) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jun 2022 12:47:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53073 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nwkEx-0003xe-R0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 08:47:52 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:58209) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nwkEv-0003wo-Vy for 54760@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 08:47:50 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D00A5C0247; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 08:47:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap43 ([10.202.2.93]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 02 Jun 2022 08:47:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=munksgaard.me; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from :from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1654174064; x= 1654260464; bh=8teM7r1HUO1cfriG9UV8hhGO7juNgMbnvkuPQZ9gw1k=; b=O wVrTx9ugeBJx3SSmoCQqTbj77G+y00kaFez030wokGc4dOZQO1UC6JTDGodEUzCJ n28QSj9BEFYq7/CXQbUAWmtzEY5ICZ6r5ZTpRZ40tie7tZEmj0pQcwO5T7ZlxS/B GuowCRdixEaB1vnRW3iupv5q/sl1Sj2xILcF9ob3jc70QcNrawfwMLTbO6DvVCjM bgdmkVpdsmuBXFEarwr7Zv+YdH7D9QMJ60tUqIl/I8eitx8hT4dhOEQAl4bW6Mwl WYMyahw5fqcgwoTHNrNYXq4ESIC31U9gpwxrsQOWg5XSVMWd9KhZRfqlFJptYSpC 12wjOvLyLjnvYvoxCaf2w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1654174064; x= 1654260464; bh=8teM7r1HUO1cfriG9UV8hhGO7juNgMbnvkuPQZ9gw1k=; b=u tGupJzaGYeZWyjqn/cZgy2DRwy4mBwnOffSH0SbAF0+hgs1e98/+Us6zSrDCogzS ETRDat2wYM+H7o1s+Xkp1hz7Ai9oo57iXOSUJ/B91oAxfk3RyHiVNiFyZO3BfJKD Q5Y17I8E5GwY7fjJ4iAp42Awtb0uc400nqvTnBbhr0PiQyGm383gLUMDcfDDajmC dxdWITfnz7bOqY0m1Wn4UV3UimRIHJS0msulwxlLUu0y4Nonl6MCgIb4NXERmks/ MGT4XzuYG8aZVwz7ApIYZCi42uf99aGyY7A82HnV9fsFUMHsu4WJvab1qwcLEss4 +wIeaFRHjSg6TfU4On9Iw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrledvgdehgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvvefutgfgsehtqhertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpedfrfhh ihhlihhpucfouhhnkhhsghgrrghrugdfuceophhhihhlihhpsehmuhhnkhhsghgrrghrug drmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefgheetieffudelteffheeugfdtfefgveejvdev hfevveeitdekleevjefhhefgleenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmh epmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehphhhilhhiphesmhhunhhkshhgrggrrhgurdhmvg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i1f894409:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0D7FD2D4006D; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 08:47:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-591-gfe6c3a2700-fm-20220427.001-gfe6c3a27 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <842828ff-b80b-4488-aa5b-5e6189e0a607@www.fastmail.com> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 14:47:22 +0200 From: "Philip Munksgaard" To: "Lars-Dominik Braun" Subject: Re: bug#54760: import: hackage: Internal libraries are not filtered out of dependency list Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 54760 Cc: 54760@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi again, On Thu, 2 Jun 2022, at 13:57, Lars-Dominik Braun wrote: > Hey, > >> Indeed, that seems to work for those packages, but it still doesn't s= eem to work for OneTuple, as mentioned here: > I=E2=80=99m attaching a patch for that, please have a look. I=E2=80=99= ll merge these > into master, since they don=E2=80=99t change any builds. That works, thanks! >> Aha! The upgrade to GHC 9.0.0 caused ghc-hashable to break. I suppose= many other packages could be broken as well. > I didn=E2=80=99t actually upgrade any packages on wip-haskell yet, so = it=E2=80=99s > likely they fail with a newer GHC than 8.10. Aha. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help.