Am Freitag, dem 18.03.2022 um 21:16 +0100 schrieb Maxime Devos: > Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op vr 18-03-2022 om 20:16 [+0100]: > > +        (G_ "state secrets."))))) > > Wouldn't this require #:substitutable? #false? > It's punny but rather inaccurate ... You can substitute state secrets, but they will be marked to see who leaked them. It's not like all of our outputs are 100% reproducible, are they? :P > WDYT of adding a package property to allow packages to document > unusual outputs? That is literally the first thing I'm doing. It is unimaginatively called 'output-descriptions and checked before either of the fallbacks. Cheers