From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 03 21:14:07 2022 Received: (at 54434) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Apr 2022 01:14:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49892 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nbBIF-0003XM-Lh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 21:14:07 -0400 Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.171]:45808) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nbBID-0003Wl-Mt for 54434@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 21:14:06 -0400 Received: from smtp102.mailbox.org (smtp102.mailbox.org [80.241.60.233]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KWt8R3szwz9sTC; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 03:13:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brendan.scot; s=MBO0001; t=1649034837; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BYNzPTg0vm0O+k8SkhTQpcafL1z7YHu2ORgg6Zk050U=; b=eurPFT96BV3RNvZxoO2nWb+K9ixNIU5GzALTvNb3qoZwVw+7ROO2Ys2+M+dBpnpGk8fIHB vspfH8nsBy+bp/DoJ/qRdvs7g6U9pC5QdE9ZDcMWaCyNE//CsDi41SPWVtQCktw/7/UwCv 8cTnVNwBP1gM/zUxyCGlbN9n9G/gjNVw0OhvRSA2lrsqt83Meb1gqPAiHRnjHhsyz1Q+PT 1/pvQQdGx6sv8yXij0a3XeseEZ3AheUfTDk+KK7lAOayfjEM7GME8NZiNIbFu5/O/wHcv/ iFHBimTQ7/SFdMakiiSH+X0BOZsfgpEFLv3J5Oq+1dOsYxFxS8VG1Jyb03Rj/Q== Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 11:13:47 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: bug#54434: [PATCH 0/6] XFCE Updates Content-Language: en-US To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=c3=a8s?= References: <20220318073844.14290-1-mail@brendan.scot> <20220318073844.14290-5-mail@brendan.scot> <87h77awjij.fsf_-_@gnu.org> From: Brendan Tildesley In-Reply-To: <87h77awjij.fsf_-_@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 54434 Cc: Maxime Devos , 54434@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: mail@brendan.scot Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 3/4/22 8:25 pm, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > [...] > “Polkit” is really called “Polkit”; “PolicyKit” was its predecessor and > it’s important to distinguish them. Understood. > I’m not convinced this package needs to be made public though because > it’s not meant to be installed manually. > > WDYT? I felt packages should have a justification for being hidden rather than unhidden :) If it should be hidden then mate-polkit its' self may as well be..? But you can have it which ever way you want. What bad thing happens when it isn't hidden? Making work for translators? > > Ludo’.