On 3/4/22 8:25 pm, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > [...] > “Polkit” is really called “Polkit”; “PolicyKit” was its predecessor and > it’s important to distinguish them. Understood. > I’m not convinced this package needs to be made public though because > it’s not meant to be installed manually. > > WDYT? I felt packages should have a justification for being hidden rather than unhidden :) If it should be hidden then mate-polkit its' self may as well be..? But you can have it which ever way you want. What bad thing happens when it isn't hidden? Making work for translators? > > Ludo’.