From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Mar 12 22:03:57 2022 Received: (at 54351) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Mar 2022 03:03:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41296 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nTEWT-0001gj-MK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 22:03:57 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:42953) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nTEWR-0001gV-HO for 54351@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 22:03:56 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-f169.google.com with SMTP id p17so10858876plo.9 for <54351@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 19:03:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:tomato:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=CmImEyTE1UExD6PLEmz8M86yt/oZpdu7TBg7wmMXZlU=; b=iSrbU4zsvHWjYsxrDMK+ZXekKOAuRIM/PlyE3za/MMt9kkoA4HHq/NC1pcFMVSF0gh jUgXaZxvCIWk8YeQAax1VjbWKIkfUGjxd8da3x6dSsFGVd934uXNI0qxxx9mV9AvxgiM DUPSC3KTTU3IphDTSWdP+DWIxA6QI1OwGnJXQc2kb6vYa1DiBqosOb5FpaMrWC0S/R0W itJBAe/WkwnQaf+hmQhD5eKXfOLBkkzBtUnB5AVXm7tjyVCCcR+cjpFakRDS9+099LuK JR/gq6s4b21yl3iEQU8qILgQ1koQ16ANZdLuZOBQq8MMQeFDc86V5sFa9EZUNXghq/2/ ZwtQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:tomato:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=CmImEyTE1UExD6PLEmz8M86yt/oZpdu7TBg7wmMXZlU=; b=zlE1A/kmpi+ssKbkFKlZGMb7UiLOLVteymuUdT+vVX0UVnaezdBQbsdEC70gfPuKuc 6EJnoOuj+OaSpINQZmp9eCvjHrZNC87wmJM4h5jA1Dt0rOAy3yuBZUke1oauLJKasRMd uz9gvgS+qfE0SIrNqmW06KPnax3GIC2hS/YpDz+jrZ+YhXWxk3mmsihAWRUB7ZJ/XGSU eMItRqS4M00+3zKd/QHcVB3TU3CFZLOa7qWsy0qWeDFSlPr+MysShuLPXl7XYMU9UaIh wDkwdAbpxys9qKcJ7DfvorBqpkFGunSfB9xKW+R21oscxoU+HJwJAx1zY5Y34lGQWcMe 8V3g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Rt/r6iEywz40whDmF8mAuBKJheQIjKbLVOouj27LMnENlsTvA KCOEGPBnfzmrqumZBu5NZzc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwi8jLJeC2LBiU/e3uWIYTdwLEw1CGUyc1Iogzjn8WP9pXZTSYv6r0vFHZYW8ETLIdLLPLAKg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4d0f:b0:1bf:6a2:5637 with SMTP id mw15-20020a17090b4d0f00b001bf06a25637mr18503805pjb.106.1647140629751; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 19:03:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from guix ([2409:4072:8e08:a987:8ecf:bb0f:1cb:6cf8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m79-20020a628c52000000b004f6f249d298sm14642882pfd.80.2022.03.12.19.03.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 12 Mar 2022 19:03:49 -0800 (PST) From: Jai Vetrivelan To: Maxime Devos Subject: Re: [bug#54351] [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-xah-fly-keys. References: <874k43tl50.fsf@gmail.com> <8853d5968ea3bd8245079e5e69ed90c2a04d8b75.camel@telenet.be> Tomato: Polka-dot Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 08:33:30 +0530 In-Reply-To: <8853d5968ea3bd8245079e5e69ed90c2a04d8b75.camel@telenet.be> (Maxime Devos's message of "Sat, 12 Mar 2022 18:59:31 +0100") Message-ID: <8735jmy2nx.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 54351 Cc: Xah Lee , 54351 <54351@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Maxime, On 2022-03-12, 18:59 +0100, Maxime Devos wrote: > Emacs is GPL3+ (according to guix show). This extension of Emacs is > GPL2-only (according to the package definition). Seems like the author > intended it to be free software, but accidentally made a license > incompatibility? Is there any requirement for third party elisp packages to be /gpl3-or-late= r/? talks only about packages in the ELPA (xah-fly-keys is not a part of any ELPA). One package in emacs-xyz.scm is /gpl2-only/, which upstream has updated to /gpl3+/. [1] My original concern was the second sentence of the license string. > Additionally, IIRC, the GPL has some requirements about including a > copy of the GPL. > > I assume these issue would be easy to correct by contacting upstream. > > I looked a little further and saw > , so I guess that > the .el is just a little out-of-date. I have contacted the author off-list regarding clarification on license. [1] https://github.com/rlister/org-present/pull/39 =2D-=20 Jai Vetrivelan --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJMBAEBCAA2FiEE0sFiNFJFp/P+5XqUp+GV74GQxVIFAmItXwcYHGphaXZldHJp dmVsYW5AZ21haWwuY29tAAoJEKfhle+BkMVSzW8QAMEDyGxCFJ20gG1n4pM3TUmN LPegYAnmsoZNnVbj6Y9YCgeSRdYCGItgQZapzwL+IJ/pTX48Zg+K2pw9hU8dfVyS ersnRPS/y2g6WfzYtqeL6seFJxUYLYhmqsdnVIQ6VR/fUw44SoaEzi+LG8ed5i/C f37OwFaFMEyvAt1Q63+EzG30aGySqHPZtOkFtmY2oK8+aOHGkB2LW7/OoKtWxHEM 8WVVIR3hckygU6oupiRaq+iSAWjJYmoj7ZL+pDOFZiP608F/VtqfvjZVzmcbpfYy J6AuW2bIsLy7li/8buzpdWC8MDWkHW6jLeHfj8yRd+YiWvWv+zAW0gGE+4mBQ8sR O3o/2Y5SRdoKKLf7FCM6LUbRROts4LXRCqr+wONsapHmzzQPG508CaFh41/ETNtC 06K09kqI6/E+28HOaC5aXuFDNzUojRqyZsONWkK43/DE4ez8Guxb4BaNdxMw2h7n cb70cbb+EP8R/GAQCk7S0hPfVOorDuaXdhSgT1T7ebHgse0KUkDqgTfaeY5VmLi1 F7sZG8sDnwHAh9J8TKEfSiVdedgZNJcajiJ1PnPOqHENZ0eNdzc5Osn+r17Q8K// xhcUqRs5/0H2eo1o/TeJCIFz1E326a8xiZgYWsjfM56FyGhwhXPXKK4WIHBUmNx4 TG/jNVrOhRl2FQmibItO =qG2r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--