From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 06 15:53:47 2022 Received: (at 54068) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Apr 2022 19:53:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59210 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ncBis-0003rc-U5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2022 15:53:47 -0400 Received: from [37.120.193.124] (port=38064 helo=mail.cock.li) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ncBir-0003rP-VH for 54068@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2022 15:53:46 -0400 Message-ID: <67812782-67d5-2936-1482-1afa7da455b3@cock.li> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cock.li; s=mail; t=1649274820; bh=CLj3c0taQmuyHczlmfnTJQkYDA44HZ6oeSohvRhaid8=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=eLruXzJYfwfebkxweXmi5GCsvVyXbRWkepCAchHkQL05llDM+XEH6UONL0RYGTPyF owproWa0+ENt+r3ZHMoMtKejrznultNW30+nhqkJfUzCNW0qFXKe/TfqPpdXwksHJe zuUeAyn3zynx0a1IOJ7NoctIw79knh11/4i+AkuZpAJn9b7hqi+E0A2df4161rGr4H oD4veCL1OgnYkYur0CrgOPMxpA/RgEaZ2SLB1DBx97ApjE5tdu9qZDHVZx+lNe+XpW eAC+HM3tcpV0XUklNyYTlqL1RXBaRQn+dkIkUWhPU/Sw8LhAJ5yFTlX7WNxDFzQDLo q7pTwS1Mqez7w== Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:53:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1 Subject: Re: bug#54068: [PATCH] Add xmrig and p2pool Content-Language: fr To: Maxime Devos , =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=c3=a8s?= References: <356b1509-0df9-6579-d440-95bc74c9f2e3@cock.li> <87pmlvmxqq.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <73ba1436-5434-c771-258d-d3a97f3ff5df@cock.li> <5effc6fe-1f61-3a97-5185-919b340bf287@cock.li> <172ba8211c961d060cb98166f9ff8fe6062b7ea9.camel@telenet.be> From: Justin Veilleux In-Reply-To: <172ba8211c961d060cb98166f9ff8fe6062b7ea9.camel@telenet.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Also, I forgot... P2pool does not have this behaviour. In fact, xmrig and p2pool are only related insofar as one needs the former to use the latter. I have not yet managed to extract the bundled dependencies of p2pool as explicit inputs. In particular, robin-hood-hashing is a c++ library which doesn't have a package structure and can't be `install [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. -0.0 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 54068 Cc: 54068@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) Also, I forgot... P2pool does not have this behaviour. In fact, xmrig and p2pool are only related insofar as one needs the former to use the latter. I have not yet managed to extract the bundled dependencies of p2pool as explicit inputs. In particular, robin-hood-hashing is a c++ library which doesn't have a package structure and can't be `install`ed. Cheers.