From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 08 18:57:33 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2022 23:57:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49111 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHaMX-00006S-Dh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 18:57:33 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:57188) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHaMV-00006L-Si for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 18:57:32 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34050) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHaMT-0000Os-Ni for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 18:57:29 -0500 Received: from [2a00:1450:4864:20::636] (port=41569 helo=mail-ej1-x636.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHaMR-0003pI-J5 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 18:57:29 -0500 Received: by mail-ej1-x636.google.com with SMTP id a8so2255568ejc.8 for ; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 15:57:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=dOVHfTZHWIGx5QKBCs9H0y2INn2Aog+DKoIWsjC7cEY=; b=EDFhpUbs3l4wLNK3Q1d3kTgkcMwgBo79MOU0kNpXzE9qnfD0E4tAKw6HE6b8hnsWsm Jxw33Qb3+txN4KrepKf+D9VcA2/dwR4Gru4g+lDVq3zSZI6/M3rNWTtKO5iaz67Ndnwz wBQLTWmBJTohpGS8D1wK9j5E/oi7XyBhs/iYFkxdkN34luvp6eDeOVzGkjv6Ex/43zWz bxsKidkVdInCe/yEWqOJTgMERM82Z0QKyeMDCD4Wqiyt2OWOa0bHFiKMXPgV4AYPOHyN oTzvtjNFxmApJGk94kyXVSYXFuti+neLV1lArSzKIsPbYfyIQ+ZCrIFkxvrBXCLScXXg HxRA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=dOVHfTZHWIGx5QKBCs9H0y2INn2Aog+DKoIWsjC7cEY=; b=PBKiU/vGtQpItmTHOyM1QJVhCcvNwe2o4EvmbEt0+DF9EFrQI3REvusJYw4Oys6Q5P x0xCmilDUjEbDBtLoKvodghvc0tEAn4dUI7goq2JcBUYktk6BA7lAA5nz48MOvNOihio 7eSHJfzLIuM1Z12m+o3ba+0w0DhwBBdPQLiVAhGBQduwmROcjSBbVCwZUbR3MRHXUgvG 1JHW+1KOVHy6G4Pfig9CWaq8FCodOjRaCp2zZwa3RlWzRcyAxHKklYiHxGT4GOwvnpMD 4GrDCyZ+DZOoCrYmHJLsDw5BXWBvBD9R7BDwq/CM+uGR2EXbUDJ87PXsne4ZMVNfzddF AwJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ASOLmA9m/jBSJ4nQ6MBDbueoUHWpuoHJYhO7lr2uBd8H71dTU uwT16RWQo+GpS51eEmC9h3nVzEKc8zqlt+egVS36+SU5VHc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxV9fVl0Ayb/6PxWWlyg1SOVj2qSxrpY3CVHHCpCxOiDoYBY3BHu21c+4GTcvXfWNo84gxBAVHaDYfRNyu08ag= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:720e:: with SMTP id m14mr5739540ejk.399.1644364645393; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 15:57:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Zacchaeus Scheffer Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 18:57:14 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: guix home not respecting guix pull -C To: bug-guix@gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000091e93105d78a7a11" X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a00:1450:4864:20::636 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::636; envelope-from=zaccysc@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-x636.google.com X-Spam_score_int: 6 X-Spam_score: 0.6 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --00000000000091e93105d78a7a11 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Guix! I came across some weird behavior with guix home. I wanted to recreate a working home environment from one machine on another (because I need a working qutebrowser install :3). I did this by doing "guix pull --allow-downgrades -C" on my non-working computer using a channels file on the working one generated with "guix package --export-channels". However, when I did "guix home reconfigure ...", old versions of packages were NOT installed. I was able to downgrade the desired package with "guix package -i" (only that package was downgraded). My understanding is that "guix home reconfigure" SHOULD behave like "guix package --manifest", and install all packages in the most recent guix pull. Very minor and not impeding me, but thought y'all should know, -Zacchaeus Scheffer --00000000000091e93105d78a7a11 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Guix!

I came across some weird b= ehavior with guix home.=C2=A0 I wanted to recreate a working home environme= nt from one machine on another (because I need a working qutebrowser instal= l :3).=C2=A0 I did this by doing "guix pull --allow-downgrades -C"= ; on my non-working computer using a channels file on the working one gener= ated with "guix package --export-channels".=C2=A0 However, when I= did "guix home reconfigure ...", old versions of packages were N= OT installed.=C2=A0 I was able to downgrade the desired package with "= guix package -i" (only that package was downgraded).

My understanding is that "guix home reconfigure" SHOULD b= ehave like "guix package --manifest", and install all packages=C2= =A0in the most recent guix pull.

Very minor and no= t impeding me, but thought y'all should know,
-Zacchaeus Sche= ffer

--00000000000091e93105d78a7a11--