From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 03 23:16:10 2022 Received: (at 53541) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2022 04:16:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58532 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nFq12-0005qF-7w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 23:16:10 -0500 Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.19]:42661) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nFq0w-0005pQ-RA for 53541@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 23:16:06 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24EA3201DA2; Thu, 3 Feb 2022 23:15:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 03 Feb 2022 23:15:56 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; bh=yfT2RHc8OML8cE4/BApyeQdGZOp o6mn/UzsMIkAqMyo=; b=M2yfNJqobhZ6L3Scmb6DgiP9D2gflT6t0XBitvEzgI0 ZnDHxchS1xbHAKXfJGX2LjgQLtPQbdgHza05H8rJ8ZjzxWeDutoXr9eWwFP6i/5p ivk0d3/ywQt3aq6P4d3H6CEtq0fqc4LFSgqMSXcLVvj3AZ4izb5GGkgJMuxtk3uI = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=yfT2RHc8OML8cE4/B ApyeQdGZOpo6mn/UzsMIkAqMyo=; b=U+ZqKWq0fLeuFYdTdJcREwBA3d2cvTfTE pW5GGuDEOCwTALfuf5verTy3b7Xy6OwBAO7EHzI5qqrpc4riI1NsT+Jb+rW4ARJm g6WbwJgKYe87wF77PRRjV0TMyYw3Fv7OXgJ1hpdmuYjeWi7QoypCqRMHevk+8/36 UwH8VdHCxrbJcToqi04zSsQh6mWGvm7GsqVEB4R6vApfdysE99cl88cNs6EwE/2j PcUCwjNk1r1x/4Fu9/A3zQZbUcAo5uP8x5BSVctMtfeTjdXrNxTSShfB27TBbQSJ NCoAydGFyu/jPR12kHw+wuvEPb4W+yJDdYgMSBqR+zbYt3Q1d/1Rg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrgeekgdeilecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertd dttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghr ihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvvddugefffeeitddthfefvdeuhffgke eikeegkeevteeghfeftefggeeuudffieenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghenucev lhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrg hmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 3 Feb 2022 23:15:55 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 23:15:53 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: bdju Subject: Re: bug#53541: backtrace during fresh Guix System install after during formatting Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53541 Cc: 53541@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 09:34:11PM -0600, bdju wrote: > It would be difficult to test now, I no longer have an empty SSD waiting > to be installed on in the same PC. Understood. > I ended up getting through an install > with the last stable release using the same settings. > From memory, it was set up for EFI, btrfs root partition, encryption > enabled, boot partition was fat32, I chose no environment (wanted to use > sway), accepted networkmanager, tor, cups... I kept the default > generated config.scm because it often crashed when trying to edit and I > was sick of starting over. I think the crash was either right before the > screen where you can edit the config or right after you tell it to apply > the config. Okay. The crash when you do edit the config has been fixed, based on our testing: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/53544 I know this report was about a different issue, but not as clearly defined. > I had a second HDD (not touched by the installer) in > addition to the SSD being installed on, and /dev/sdc/ was the flash > drive with the installer image on it. > I am glad to hear it's (maybe) fixed. I'll download a new ISO, but I > don't have a hypervisor configured to test this sort of thing. I could > maybe try it with a different computer, but still it would be hard to > find one I'm willing to wipe I think. Sorry I can't be more help. > I have still only ever done 3 full Guix System installs, all years > apart. Unfortunately I never considered the experience fun enough to do > besides when absolutely necessary. No worries! You already helped a lot by reporting the bug and giving us all the details you can. I will do some tests in a VM, choosing non-default filesystems and partitioning.