From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 21 04:55:17 2022 Received: (at 53463) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Mar 2022 08:55:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35828 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nWDoq-0008FZ-Rq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 04:55:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41246) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nWDoo-0008FI-Uj for 53463@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 04:55:15 -0400 Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=38322 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nWDog-0006vm-BD; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 04:55:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=n6HJtcbiqUui3YVPMZ6LTcgxP/aQbi9kF8eU9s26pYI=; b=IAVCgGS2xMmobRvlET+J 6Bdu0sYy0PfFPABNP3gSKD8EYlT0MQtHSfpShrU3PekURHBF4ADp58ahWzXCC4xrJfXDV43Z2Q55x S7/z2MQjZR+W5MiI0emBwF/GPzWGtMXPve4m5SAugVQvCrwehhEjilxPDcH34GHnkUh9nIbLSS+++ P5Mxe6sLXUIo7/UKwNATP4M8I+BVXRq3qZ//9TUzB+Yc33Bnt2NyaboYXiwYxrUp/sRJLI8cIZ5uM DC2S59PgVBQPZAkmvj4E2vHkP8zUvPivuqAx6/MCoOJL9PU541vKsedz+D/WUSeAuv2e6zVaA1oH3 8fGmAuExy1XZ6w==; Received: from 71.125.192.77.rev.sfr.net ([77.192.125.71]:59582 helo=meije) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nWDoe-0003mt-E0; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 04:55:05 -0400 From: Mathieu Othacehe To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#53463: ci.guix.gnu.org not building the 'guix' job References: <87leyt2jsr.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfsznh2z.fsf@gnu.org> <875ypv3qjo.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgn1aca4.fsf@gnu.org> <87cziflmyh.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 09:55:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87cziflmyh.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Mon, 21 Mar 2022 09:38:30 +0100") Message-ID: <87tubradne.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53463 Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , 53463@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hey Ludo, > However, evaluations are marked as =E2=80=9Cfailed=E2=80=9D, even though = their build log > shows they succeeded, and if you click on one of them, you see that all > its builds are there: > > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/168652 > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/168652/log/raw > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/guix?border-high=3D169749 This started at the time we enabled the armhf architecture, so I guess it is marked as failed because the guix specification could not be evaluated for this architecture. Thanks, Mathieu