On 06/03/2022 6:48 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello! > > Vinicius, could you take a look at v5 of this patch series? > > Thanks for reviewing! > > Ludo’. Hi Ludo, Vivien. Sorry for the long wait. I will be busy until mid-April. I did review the patches earlier and LGTM apart from minor style/lint and description issues, but I could fix that before committing. I saw that someone pushed a wip-python-mne branch and thought they were taking care of this. I have some questions for other maintainers, like 1. Is it OK to have that many bootstrap packages for pytest modules (patches 8 to 16) and in files different than where they are supposed to be (e.g. decopatch-minimal in python-check to bootstrap pytest-harvest)? It seems that there are no other options in this case though. 2. Should python-no-verison (patch 22) be a public variable? It is an example package, doesn't seem to be useful to expose it. If it's OK I could push the series up to patch 26. I haven't reviewed 27 and on in v5. 3. Not a question but it would be good to review FSDG status of python-mne, since it contains code to download non-free data.