From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 18 10:36:34 2022 Received: (at 53224) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jan 2022 15:36:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51450 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n9qXC-0004kw-1p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 10:36:34 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:52758) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n9qX7-0004kd-HI for 53224@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 10:36:32 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FAD3806; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 16:36:23 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GqxMFeQBI2cS; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 16:36:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net [91.160.117.201]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48DEB203; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 16:36:21 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Profile definition, was Re: bug#53224: Cookbook recipe about profile collisions References: <87v8ym4sav.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmoqo3b7.fsf@gnu.org> <17e692ec987.c9fc5e4191836.2115614241637446332@excalamus.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 29 =?utf-8?Q?Niv=C3=B4se?= an 230 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 16:36:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Leo Famulari's message of "Mon, 17 Jan 2022 13:40:53 -0500") Message-ID: <87tue1dpjf.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1FAD3806 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.10 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53224 Cc: guix-devel , 53224 <53224@debbugs.gnu.org>, Matt X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Hi, Leo Famulari skribis: > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 12:56:20PM -0500, Matt wrote: >> Leo is 100% correct that my understanding is still rather weak. I'll do = my best despite that to help make the documentation better. > > I hope you will not feel too bad about that. Remember, everyone begins > by not knowing anything. Your situation is not unique at all. Rather, > your energy for improving the documentation for yourself and others is > exemplary, and will improve Guix in the long run. I agree, and I apologize for throwing my own guess of what you did and did not do, Matt. Ludo=E2=80=99.