From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 09 09:40:44 2022 Received: (at 53132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jan 2022 14:40:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49453 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n6ZND-0004vK-G5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2022 09:40:44 -0500 Received: from mail-4318.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.18]:51045) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n6ZNA-0004v2-3J for 53132@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2022 09:40:41 -0500 Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2022 14:40:32 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail2; t=1641739232; bh=8NQaga2J3TQ2DHXsdqDb/nvEEGTzftKO2KTiB3IKUac=; h=Date:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: From:To:Cc; b=KG99bY1v6qneDMs/h7b8uon6R3s0yPgWlnIDwjDplZBuiLUVBdwdVUfpWWmgXV9Un jFxE8WdRUOe8Ns6oecCOkYGAF0SXv24BsnQPuZpKdX2C9FsDrrYR1/r1oVoWG2WToN fkP6iM0+sgrxg0ByE0HZbQyDUt6+Oglfxo8/1o3b1JKaKoGYU8pcHGM7GPrsC25Pie qZAeLgGFurJdW+Rp+JpfEiyTNrjrM3KEPMODbByVJAiUb/1k78JJzp04YKDmCcZ69z 9pR0R0HNyYjsOX7oU3HI7q2xsZ0Pm4IxbSRS97t6rznV/vHJ8QqgVPuk12uTwGhDdb NOn2PVWvlstHQ== From: Disseminate Dissent Subject: Re: gnu: Add newaita-reborn-icon-theme Message-ID: <7k7j8fyb5Ia9sY6-SbnT0SqKUUY8FrUbY0bk7DZ4nRsVj9Yxf1mx1uEMRWf9zyjZR8ikcxOXaEqGWaU3KypHGiaxGlwE1iC0j9caHwOXOyU=@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO, MISSING_HEADERS shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hey lilyp, > There's no reason to set up an icons file. We have gnome-xyz, which > carries themes, icon-themes and extensions, which is also visually > grouped into these categories for the most part. Sort it in [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (disseminatedissent[at]protonmail.com) 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [185.70.43.18 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO Reply-To/From or Reply-To/body contain different freemails X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53132 Cc: 53132@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Disseminate Dissent Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) Hey lilyp, > There's no reason to set up an icons file. We have gnome-xyz, which > carries themes, icon-themes and extensions, which is also visually > grouped into these categories for the most part. Sort it into the > icons there. It was suggested in the IRC that I make an icons module for independent ico= n themes that are unaffiliated with GNOME and KDE. But I'd be happy to move= it wherever it is preferred. > Given that this has no release at all, can we really pin the current > head of master and assume this will be roughly the same Newaita as e.g. > on Arch or Gnome Look (which for the record is still broken in > Epiphany)? I don't follow your line of thought. I'm currently using the icon theme wit= h no issue whatsoever, how would adding it to the repository be any differe= nt? > That Newaita appears to by CC BY-NC-SA, so it'd be disallowed in Guix. Ah yes, this was the wrong link -- pointing to the original Newaita icons. = Newaita-reborn is GPL3. Is the declaration of GPL3 insufficient? Disseminate, Peace =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me= ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 On Sunday, January 9th, 2022 at 7:56 AM, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > Hi, > > > Disseminate Dissent disseminatedissent@protonmail.com > > > > From: paladhammika paladhammika@protonmail.com > > You probably want to set up your MUA or git correctly :) > > There's no reason to set up an icons file. We have gnome-xyz, which > > carries themes, icon-themes and extensions, which is also visually > > grouped into these categories for the most part. Sort it into the > > icons there. > > > - (let ((commit "1bb3884112bd7d97fcf046ad9eaccebca3983f5b") > > - (revision "0")) > > > > > > - (package > > - (name "newaita-reborn-icon-theme") > > > > > > - (version (git-version "0.0.0" revision commit)) > > > > > > Given that this has no release at all, can we really pin the current > > head of master and assume this will be roughly the same Newaita as e.g. > > on Arch or Gnome Look (which for the record is still broken in > > Epiphany)? > > > - (build-system gnu-build-system) > > > > > > - (arguments > > - '(#:tests? #f > > > > > > - #:make-flags (list (string-append "PREFIX=3D" (assoc-ref > > > > > > > > %outputs "out"))) > > > > - #:phases > > > > > > - (modify-phases %standard-phases > > > > > > - (delete 'bootstrap) > > > > > > - (delete 'configure) > > > > > > - (delete 'build) > > > > > > - (delete 'install)))) > > > > > > copy-build-system exists, so you might want to use that instead of > > whatever this is trying to achieve. > > > - (home-page "https://cbrnix.github.io/Newaita/") > > > > > > That Newaita appears to by CC BY-NC-SA, so it'd be disallowed in Guix. > > On a related note: > > > - (license license:gpl3+)))) > > > > > > We have no ways of claiming that. Upstream only put the GPL (3, no > > plus) somewhere in the repo and called it a day. You might want to ask > > them to clarify where the license applies and whether it's a plus by > > raising an issue. > > > - (synopsis "Newaita Reborn icon theme, remastered, refreshed and > > > > > > > > made cleaner") > > > > - (description > > > > > > - "Newaita Reborn is a revision of the Newaita icon theme, > > > > > > > > resembling > > > > +old style icons and the color of material design.") > > Less advertisement, more description please :) > > Cheers