From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 02 01:36:33 2022 Received: (at 52943) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jan 2022 06:36:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59801 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n3uTp-0001V2-A1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jan 2022 01:36:33 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-f54.google.com ([209.85.167.54]:41681) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n3uTo-0001Up-29 for 52943@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jan 2022 01:36:32 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-f54.google.com with SMTP id x7so68629277lfu.8 for <52943@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 01 Jan 2022 22:36:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=G03TtI/QqMuMNMx5DRdVf1AzIOnyggLpscGgYNI+f6Y=; b=fm3lvhozPESlzydEg1Wvmm2bzl0sjKFDUoZp+4eOc+z4FTOM5QVxN/t9w4hEnIAWEk VUMBQ7UP78RTIxjki4S8fG5amo6GB3W0hfseuyPJwTVPy3v0wiN5xImPGGUV2/YWFtja jRg8e9PXcTBKmoP05eI5y3cp1yNqvWEQ43sAh3Wx2oxMLhWr5lNKmxyRnojNHti+PQPd 53OT28gtbNaVt5gvnJSiACw1gNoR2cMpnd3i6zA8u4iepMhl6V5CyU4iM/Pb1YBLY1qS T789iIPQxTKY29DviE73aFZFCHxgNV+q68YeOjzs3srqpQR71d9sTc14pA13gavD5WlT GpZA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=G03TtI/QqMuMNMx5DRdVf1AzIOnyggLpscGgYNI+f6Y=; b=rSF3ORsq5y8ibkKjbn0pbKYjORmv2oINRT6IYA1Seoof+5E0ILucyhr6a3PGeUF0lc s6YWrF/S/8czycKPwR2h6NlUTwtiqz0ZtLahF+cv5GwIxt6KLudTnvRMt372XkPXHms+ mfBSc9Ni9QC1dQtdbN32Oo48DQ0fMQ/oLiRY2AKxAouAoSa8dP8UmgBmCBYEWNq1fK+W 2oH/ggAsBUJ8o/seoX6cJo+4l1GkaIM7vPLuoUJTB9wGfdHJSzqentNbP1oI4esT7nMu q1Uu5OLjdLbIoXuVBXrFou+Tuo8vfx7tash3XdoLrgSUL3WfgyCL5Qs+SbxZKn/JRYYk JZZg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532wUL1/sxNKVFrNMKssb6ZKMyhv1TsUsT3RP0BkGj+P9c9d4NWd eKYaPQ3pCU5aXHfdveZngBalZkZXph+tdPPKse9yB+/MGjuoCQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy9n/jq4yqGKbzHRtycagtkFrWwv+ywscbeNnDshT0LupS7/jmxauDLDxJMnh/Z0e95DuK20Sbirjx1pIpYkmw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:b9f:: with SMTP id b31mr35958190lfv.319.1641105385822; Sat, 01 Jan 2022 22:36:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Aiko Kyle Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2022 23:36:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#52943: Cannot build guix as part of guix system reconfigure after commit 224d437fb4 on aarch64 To: Leo Famulari Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52943 Cc: 52943@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 9:51 PM Leo Famulari wrote: > > Thanks, and I've attached a graph of the same operating system > declaration from the same revision of Guix but for x86_64, along with > rendered images of both graphs. > > The graphs clearly show that xorg-server is provided in two places on > aarch64. The question is why? Thanks Leo for the help on IRC! What we seem to have figured out is that commit 49599fab56 is almost certainly the culprit. So the issue is that somehow using sddm-service-type in %desktop-services on aarch64 instead of gdm-service-type which is used an x86_64 after that commit results in xorg-server-service-type being included twice, likely though gdm-service-type still being included somewhere. set-xorg-configuration is a potential culprit, although so far I haven't' been able to make the test pass by modifying the call to set-xorg-configuration in desktop.tmpl to explicitly pass sddm-service-type.