On 2022-01-17, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2022-01-17, Pierre Langlois wrote: >> Chris Marusich writes: >>> Chris Marusich writes: > >>>> If nobody has further comments, I will commit the attached version to >>>> master in about 24 hours. >>> >>> I've committed this in 24c3485bb3ffc05e687ef6513ac287b8d3048bab. We >>> still need to update the "guix" package, so even if you run "guix pull" >>> right now, you won't be able to successfully build "guix" after pulling >>> on aarch64-linux yet. >>> >>> I will coordinate with the other people who are helping to make the >>> 1.4.0 release to ensure that this fix makes it into the 1.4.0 release. >>> See this guix-devel email thread for details: >>> >>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-01/msg00296.html >> >> That's awesome, thank you! > > FWIW, I can also confirm that updating the "guix" package to a version > that contains 24c3485bb3ffc05e687ef6513ac287b8d3048bab allows the "guix" > package (which contains the fairly important "guix-daemon"), to build > again. Thanks for getting it that far! > > Haven't been able to upgrade my aarch64 systems without local patches > for over a month now... glad to see a fix is *almost* ready! > > Is there anything in particular holding back upating the guix package > (other than the huge amount of big merges in progress, release > preparation, etc. and etc.)? I went ahead and pushed to master: f758ede583ef9662963873750206540f58ff3c45 gnu: guix: update to 1.3.0-22.24c3485. I tried building a newer version, but there were new test suite failures on both aarch64 and x86_64 :/ Happy aarch64ing! live well, vagrant