From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 22 19:01:24 2021 Received: (at 52483) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Dec 2021 00:01:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60045 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n0BXv-0000hW-Qw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 19:01:24 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:48559) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n0BXu-0000hH-Ce for 52483@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 19:01:22 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF685C016A; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 19:01:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 22 Dec 2021 19:01:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=Cb1Sspz9MQsg+95otJu6hhkI +2oDj82QItcnZJYBPW4=; b=JqVSrQNLMrGlAIJ6IzpGO4qoOvWZN6b8h+YF2Wuw fjHLxfwLOnBg55bLWSNv/ncR0MKpKFaPOHTMkVlBGamDtvxCR1zcq5seuFZcTED1 6sMMPTC1zytaKfPiRklCqz6eHhF8qMqhpA1uPvgO1FXdi1qL/24fTsdBFTrZsk1i aMM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Cb1Ssp z9MQsg+95otJu6hhkI+2oDj82QItcnZJYBPW4=; b=a2gurMF1qIKMiUn1kpcdXh frCbC2+4ALL75SWa3/0/CbO84TucnYs0znWwVWa2SWWtYwDO9flVngCQ7A82BC5D fFdw9/eQ4S1FmuaGKlXK6gG0mjGX6Xyjls5xHWytOZLkewleoKrBYppCZoMOTvTe y0Y/U0UcN381I68Sb5hsRcmzaRbyI1QSJsNAg3N13s0iSbNOsC0jib24xGt8ES2Q X3kToZkC5B0aqcMTHaDlXkC/Jxbs5NC/IF9iWkF2rlCaE/4DGcCa1jdqKx+D0u6n iQ2lrNGBYEQeLhxABbWg9nb7yEF1KHyAFdUuuUbJlYeFkzx3JS5gjvHhrCqnWBbg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddruddtjedgudekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfh rghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpedvvddugefffeeitddthfefvdeuhffgkeeikeegkeevteeghfeftefggeeuudff ieenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 19:01:16 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 19:01:15 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: Re: bug#52483: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption Message-ID: References: <87mtky4ik6.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <874k744a0p.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52483 Cc: 52483@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 03:36:25PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 03:25:42PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > > > I tested with GnuPG 2.2.23 by building all packages that depend directly > > > on GnuPG. There were no new failures on x86_64-linux when using GnuPG > > > 2.2.32. > > I see that my message was confusing, with mixed up version numbers. > There's no regressions on x86_64 with 2.2.32. Since it fixes this bug, > I'd like to make it available soon. Maybe we can unhide the gnupg-2.2.32 > variable, and remove emacs-pinentry, since everyone is saying that it's > no longer useful. Here are patches for this: