From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 14 12:32:41 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2021 17:32:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59444 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxBfN-0000IA-FI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:32:41 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:37904) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxBfM-0000I3-FP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:32:40 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57830) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxBfM-0004HR-3b for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:32:40 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:43279) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxBfK-00063i-8p for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:32:39 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FDC95C0226; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:32:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:32:37 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=lNiV2KVsjkzun/qLU9uZ7/KU hgT6r7/3tqcvk4x6z5M=; b=k/aXu10PsnCSfyI0PvDCv4RlyTKEsn5rj7cRRwCl 50ehWwS9kxwvby30EgOqO8BGxvopCyH4IzWmrg/vEWb27yp/arwwPNyXEtRY5GHC wcX8Qso4TWQvL+FYPAk9bdT2yatTyge2n8oKsv+A1VL1qCidQAxEyX4nzz2xdJYQ CGk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=lNiV2K Vsjkzun/qLU9uZ7/KUhgT6r7/3tqcvk4x6z5M=; b=VxwrZwz1s339ktX+JMqqx6 RbpOQXePKFWrzUl+qlrcOKewy6M8eG3SoyDUfO3+P6ZwX28V3nSFkrmqQXTTFCAT Rc91aetfAwlBzxOa4W3yS56D9euMvGnQzpn5DmMqGXmD+HdsbO9i+m3BqlPwFPCb 8p+0DMEynvNDOUeL6/tqguavDJRHADgi68GNXXzMhMIMf+R6XKRH9/pR6Mx/PBa4 jQ85PhfiL9j9Z5fJDgu9HmHf0X+RF7TuS0XPPTS85Ew0bt9kQY9hR8NlTClaeZBN egiHXCN2sQFnYOjFVrBNaRDFlQeo3P4PH/zIB930K2D3DMWIqnvBDOkW739GAjKQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrledtgddutddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtre ertddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgr rhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudekveegteekleetgfeitdejgfejke ffudethedvhfeukeduleeikeejfeehffetnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfr rghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:32:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:32:31 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Re: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CHjMzBYbr9RBi//q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.26; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=out2-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) --CHjMzBYbr9RBi//q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 11:46:12AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > Here is a patch that unhides gnupg-2.2.32, updates it to 2.2.33, and > makes emacs-pinentry use that package variant. After sending this patch, I noticed that gnupg-2.2.32 is also used by qgpgme. This bug was noticed earlier, but misinterpreted. Expect a v2 patch that uses 'gnupg-next' instead of gnupg-2.2.33, and adjusts all users accordingly. --CHjMzBYbr9RBi//q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAmG41SwACgkQJkb6MLrK fwhNBxAA1uUiwq7QU6o5Nn44+QGILw/JHDvBD2mFEdoz/VFOU3EsNiYW5oRIlGYf +7gtKcnehOuZ27Ojg1IN99xm2vr/R+V49rQHZt1eRUc/pCVSu8Gy2AAnqXbAlpyW PY7kQbCqfFGjMpbq6b0rNxqUaPJZUd6/Jhmqp6a1/G9inPz+n3JeGBtC/kcl+5k4 Tp927thw+ZSS7OZX3HEI2OUYewgyXg8tRpg14BkQBm50sDQrJEXOhOD2TLoP62Ld 8T+SZNIHy68Mzgr1XqNeXAZxkL5vTNUYJYrCE0IPdYZEm+r/PXVVWejd+JDFcyl/ Xu8kNbme9i7QrPIlyr0m8gb0RRbVi5PWPHO6MLqT+A7jfIgjRaPw0B3yDbET8Vcr gtHP5FLkKa0FMvb6vPQtmBqKrLN3GS5omxanmMJn/Jv06IZDezYoBOg+Xrtdygrr UN1T4KHvwaI6mU9yJh2O7lJJ9pCrv9L8srkubg4CWGyLk84GufUcIQo+DyzpeEu+ NKs3GscPUEZ2hiekDZvWPnNT4olHvA4MI6G8CNsjKr9U1NRekUmQs5dQPgqeuuFa 0b36HIqd7mcZexghmK8cTdLohWpmouHAqlq5sT/uwdRwfoGejJ+onU8/WxHgsjdF 885WtUALCaeHFfAaYXEfFYHweUmwz0xSxBeLxu1ajGzNWt0RwMw= =BbfP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CHjMzBYbr9RBi//q--