From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 03 20:14:26 2023 Received: (at 51770) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2023 01:14:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47168 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pCsML-0000F4-MD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2023 20:14:25 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f181.google.com ([209.85.160.181]:46070) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pCsMJ-0000El-IV for 51770@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2023 20:14:24 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f181.google.com with SMTP id h21so26155089qta.12 for <51770@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 03 Jan 2023 17:14:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nU97PfpFNtygyUmAcjLfT8+moNI/8ZgeU2vNcmd9lxg=; b=GqzYWKmIH40Bk5by6g5vl9XIGGzYtbZmr+hdxqVG9WzoGmQP8eJzw2qRljvawkbEni f3kdtkRzfq+NnMWHY/cQkHEKz0IjDkqB8KSwtWgF40yUyvHLjr7StCPhhiUpASCMDRWL W9FguHG0dt13PXTtS4Y3aaz0spDnsoc8cSOOB/jgGRwAyKkYXf4m6XtrGlRiroIuVRK1 desUSDSVmdUcNG+xDdRWjCsERgsWXgyQWhKzJDpWXYPmptTbVry9jevadvMF6Qo2FXI5 4t5TS8dC+ehif9+IRd0zZ5+tCLJQ7TwJxlX9moHX0SuBirqFCG8X5iRCdOtUZIGXX4sS yqYQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nU97PfpFNtygyUmAcjLfT8+moNI/8ZgeU2vNcmd9lxg=; b=d7C13VjCTWVNYnHB2FpTco2HKyyGLq/g4TkSUeQa3ozJVVlVi0VEEY1+usEgrHj/21 YjhswsCin7Ot6wgrb+TZbzmzSNCo/5K6P4dKwnX1r3PzoRMWxZKex38L/K/BMfwZgAdU GbmWyjzrEc3b/DTYwF9z6WfMciVLsjqoyXlhd10M9YpQrNTNjzf8Cvuj5MgCBocV3G0E FxkE3Lf02P8InNJpnDeOh8FZkuEA9su03TgQVeH/NHjTgI0VoR9X7ZQfIP7h+CgQd+Qe mDhgynTHtsSdn432dmJvuaBrveVYueijWImoaI//BgLTq0Y44O0N5rY/43Exj9nalUTl UDDA== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2krEy6RQfPPUX9xZKhkmxx9jCVV7fvDx3fAc9x07IHqAI3IO/et3 w2p7PvV6nekqexvbi8cxqa+/cPoZPA5obUpj X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXvs06oZBOHN31tBYlhDyJ6Bxo1F1LUYfhK5vN7gqkk0WG0OWbKP7GDs+rsyOnGRgIPlvqsXTg== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4f17:0:b0:3a6:95ff:ffd4 with SMTP id b23-20020ac84f17000000b003a695ffffd4mr500602qte.52.1672794857790; Tue, 03 Jan 2023 17:14:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from hurd (dsl-10-135-221.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.135.221]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u16-20020a05620a0c5000b006e07228ed53sm22985176qki.18.2023.01.03.17.14.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 03 Jan 2023 17:14:17 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: zamfofex Subject: Re: bug#51770: [PATCH] update Hurd packages References: <1850188127.399847.1636645881998@privateemail.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2023 20:14:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1850188127.399847.1636645881998@privateemail.com> (zamfofex@twdb.moe's message of "Thu, 11 Nov 2021 12:51:21 -0300 (BRT)") Message-ID: <87r0wbw17b.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51770 Cc: 51770@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello! zamfofex writes: > I have been working on updating the Hurd packages for quite a while > now. My goal was to use netdde (which wasn=E2=80=99t previously working w= ell) > so that I could install Guix GNU/Hurd on my computer and use it. > I was asked (in IRC) to say that my changes are necessary to be able > to get netdde to a working state, since non-release updates are > generally not accepted. However, I will note that all packages I > updated (as far as I can tell) were already in a non-release commit. > > I have applied my changes over the 'core-update-frozen' branch because > it seems like the newer version of glibc therein is necessary for > these newer package commit versions to build successfully. Thanks for this contribution! > I will send the patch file generated by 'git format-patch' as an attachme= nt. > > If I have done anything wrong while sending this email, please let me kno= w and apologies in advance. Changes to packages are usually made each in their own commit; also, the one line .patch file would better be implemented as a substitution phase (using substitute*). Could you please send an updated patch series with the above changes? --=20 Thanks, Maxim