From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 28 06:38:35 2022 Received: (at 51466) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2022 10:38:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54033 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o68c6-0007wn-Oy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 06:38:35 -0400 Received: from andre.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.53]:60870) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o68bw-0007wK-DJ for 51466@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 06:38:26 -0400 Received: from ptr-bvsjgyhxw7psv60dyze.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:3c5f:2eff:feb0:ba5a]) by andre.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id oaeN270034UW6Th01aeN82; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 12:38:22 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#51466: bug#53355: guix shell --check: confusing error message From: Maxime Devos To: Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 12:38:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <877d51fcz9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h7a08kub.fsf@gmail.com> <87lez5td4n.fsf@gnu.org> <87sftc4osu.fsf@gmail.com> <87h79slysd.fsf@gnu.org> <87sft13dyv.fsf@gmail.com> <874k59d802.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnhy2w73.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <878rudzsmv.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfozzglf.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <875ykpdsbd.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87mtdyif6j.fsf@gnu.org> <6e1506e91c5aa75ca366a61d65f7e461eebf9923.camel@telenet.be> <877d51fcz9.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+kpxCyyjpkIp2Qsc/JoY" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r22; t=1656412703; bh=KI9RGxPmj4GN7NhKURDzu5iberHiT3ZoYOvT8Dp33dY=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=oK4CjH6Gkruh8pDxpm6qO7ITf7jpy+fGeb+GR+xLf3PEG8XOy//1zrud8+UINyCOB QI5C79Od37jYZM9BM880HqJgboSfc4Tl2d4yx0DoRhbliH/MvJvXmw82w9XBJUy9Zg 9jpkKq7xYiqkoU5SJBVI8Gn54KlJiHRuQ3yEKHtAlMmWfLPuhvJlLPY9q95RhGrt2x E0mrwd4gxgWEZZ5RedI+aUi12IG3aOnGmrETJxfraJj+PIZj2ThR+Z8+ovvpnpSgM/ +WmZ+QxY681Vrzz/7Y8G4aWOhdiMan8GaBdheUFZgC6Kw2C0a0DGAOjc89BCpKm8lF i7xA4IKtIvuIw== X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 51466 Cc: 53355@debbugs.gnu.org, Chris Marusich , 51466@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-+kpxCyyjpkIp2Qsc/JoY Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludovic Court=C3=A8s schreef op di 28-06-2022 om 09:45 [+0200]: > Maxime Devos skribis: >=20 > > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s schreef op ma 27-06-2022 om 12:17 [+0200]: > > > I agree that Dash should be fixed, but in the meantime, we still want > > > our stuff to work with the broken Dash (it=E2=80=99s the default on > > > Debian/Ubuntu, isn=E2=80=99t it?). > >=20 > > If Dash is fixed, then it's non-broken >=20 > Even if a fix goes upstream today, people will still be using a distro > with the broken Dash for years, literally.=C2=A0 That=E2=80=99s why I thi= nk we have > to cope with it. Then it could be fixed in that distro? And if the distro intentionally keeps it broken for years, then that seems more a problem in the distro than Guix to me. Greetings, Maxime. --=-+kpxCyyjpkIp2Qsc/JoY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYrraGBccbWF4aW1lZGV2 b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7k4aAP9TLOzjPUNch0uIQnYszrUpUETF qu719+XYCJh50eAkygEAkcL+44Gn5YwZIjwxXwHmXmsFi1icNlOvGVIQfrrjdg0= =2gjF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-+kpxCyyjpkIp2Qsc/JoY--